POLITICALPYRO CONTRIBUTORS

The Pyro still goes without basic Internet service… But, from time to time he will text message me and unload a few thoughts or ask me what I would like him to comment on. Today you will be treated to his latest cynical rant…. Ted Kennedy.

When others speak about Ted they look at his so called ‘contributions’ rather than his character as a human being. Ted’s unwillingness to resign is key when assessing this.

Like Woodrow Wilson whose wife ran the country for over a year when he was incapacitated by a stroke… Kennedy clung on to his power tighter than his own wheelchair when bouncers from the local titty bar were hired to lift the senators fat ass on and off his majesty’s royal yacht.

It has been rumored but not confirmed that during the inaugural when Teddy suffered a massive seizure someone managed to stick a pen in his gin filled mouth to get a signature for the pending Health Care takeover.

Even in death Kennedy still retains his power to sign legislation… aids have been seen placing documents over his grave for 2 drops of alcohol that percolates from the gin soaked soil above his coffin.

These drops, like the drool from the corners of Wilson’s paralyzed mouth will serve as an official signature until his replacement can be named in 2025, when the grave is expected to run dry.

Any senator with any regard for his constituents would have allowed the people to name a replacement the second he was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer.

But not Teddy. He was only loyal to himself.

The way you can tell that Teddy sucked as a human and a politician is that he never ate a bullet. It would have been a waste of metal.

As his brothers lay in their graves, done in by the hands of hired mob assassins… Teddy was given a pass for his grandfathers gangster days as a rum runner… As Joe amassed blood money that fueled the ambitions of his corrupt, power motivated doings. The irresponsible behavior that surrounded Teddy’s life style was SOP.

This is why Teddy saw himself as immortal… He thought he could buy his way out of death.

So the senate seat now remains vacant, as so do the eyes of Mary Jo Kopechne, amidst the ruins created by a man whose legacy was merely to create a pile of human wreckage for someone else to sort through and clean up.

After the success of Mary Jo’s demise, Ted Kennedy elected himself Mayor of Cooterville and stamped his way through fifths of Jack Daniels and a populace of pussy.

He was so far down the tit line he had to suck his moms asshole.

Sorry ass Commie Fuck! Never worked a day in this life. He should be deader.

‘The Cause of My Life’> This is what Ted Kennedy deems his calling.
Inside the fight for universal health care.

>Click Here for the Link<

You know what Americas problem is? Its people like Ted Kennedy. Here is a murderous, rapist, drunken, drug using, scandalous, and lets not forget… privileged family with no end insight of ever spending its ill gotten family fortune and they want to give us something that he wouldn’t even use. Hey Ted, watch this video and tell me… Why should I trust you?

When I first saw this I nearly fell off my chair. But then…. I had too remember that it was a Kennedy that believed this.

Here is the story…
NEWSWEEK/Kathleen Kennedy Townsend

Without a Doubt
Why Barack Obama represents American Catholics better than the pope does.

Tomorrow Pope Benedict XVI and President Barack Obama meet for the first time, an affair much anticipated and in some circles frowned upon by American Catholics in the wake of Obama’s controversial Notre Dame commencement speech in May. Conservatives in the church denounced Obama’s appearance as a nod by the premier Catholic university to a conciliatory politics that heralds the start of a slippery moral slope.

In truth, though, Obama’s pragmatic approach to divisive policy (his notion that we should acknowledge the good faith underlying opposing viewpoints) and his social-justice agenda reflect the views of American Catholic laity much more closely than those vocal bishops and pro-life activists. When Obama meets the pope tomorrow, they’ll politely disagree about reproductive freedoms and homosexuality, but Catholics back home won’t care, because they know Obama’s on their side. In fact, Obama’s agenda is closer to their views than even the pope’s.

It’s fitting that Obama’s visit comes just days after the publication of “Charity in Truth,” a Vatican encyclical that declares unions, regulation of capitalism’s excesses, and environmentalism to be ethical imperatives. The document gives moral credence to Obama’s message and to progressive politics writ large.

Even more intriguing is the pope’s support for political activism, which he refers to in the encyclical as “the institutional path … of charity, no less excellent and effective than the kind of charity which encounters the neighbor directly.” As a member of a family that preached that politics is an honorable profession, I see that he is opening the church to roles that for too long have been neglected. Here Obama (the community organizer from Chicago) could teach the pope a lot about politics—and what a Catholic approach to politics could entail. They agree, too, on poverty and Middle East peace. So far so good on papal-presidential concordance.

But there they part ways. Politics requires the ability to listen to different points of view, to step into others’ shoes. Obama might call it empathy. While the pope preaches love, listening to the other has been a particular stumbling block for the Catholic hierarchy (as it is for many in power). The hierarchy ignores women’s equality and gays’ cry for justice because to heed them would require that it admit error and acknowledge that the self-satisfied edifice constructed around sex and gender has been grievously wrong. Before he became John Paul II, Karol Wojtyla had a telling all-or-nothing formulation: “If it should be decided that contraception is not an evil in itself then we should have to concede frankly that the Holy Spirit is on the side of the Protestant Churches.”

That attitude has resulted in some heinous decisions. Most famously, in the lead up to the encyclical “Humanae Vitae” in 1968, an advisory body of theologians and laity empaneled by the pope advised that the church should reverse its position on birth control and concede that the issue should be a question for morality and for science. But authority—not truth, not love—prevailed: Pope Paul VI, listening to the advice of Wojtyla, disagreed with the majority of these advisers, who had voted 69 to 10 for change, fretting that to change this position would weaken his authority.

In the same vein, American bishops in the 1970s struggled to produce a paper that would address the concerns of women. After nine years of effort, they gave up. Why? According to Bishop P. Francis Murphy, bishops see themselves as “teachers, not learners: truth can not emerge through consultation.” Pope Benedict, having lived in the safety and security of the Vatican for much of his professional life, is part of this culture that silences dissent. (His last job was as the enforcer of doctrine.)

In 1979, Sister Theresa Kane, the head of the Sisters of Mercy and the president of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, greeted Pope John Paul II on his first visit to the United States by proposing that the Church provide “for the possibility of women as persons being included in all ministries of our Church,” including the priesthood. This was greeted with revulsion at the Vatican, which insists that the only people who can represent God in the priestly role are those with male sex organs.

Yet polls bear out that American Catholics do not want to be told by the Vatican how to think. Despite the rhetoric of love and truth, the Vatican shows disdain (if not disgust) toward gays. But 54 percent of American Catholics find gay relationships to be morally acceptable, according to a 2009 Gallup poll. Meanwhile, against all scientific evidence and protestations from clergy on the ground, the pope claims that condoms aggravate the spread of AIDS. Seventy-nine percent of American Catholics disagree, according to a 2007 poll by Catholics for Choice.

When Sen. John Kerry, a pro-choice Catholic, ran for president in 2004, several bishops decided to deny him communion. A poll done at the time by Time magazine showed that 73 percent of American Catholics disagreed with that decision, and 83 percent said the bishops’ move wouldn’t change their vote. In fact, more than two thirds said the church shouldn’t try to influence the way Catholics vote at all or tell candidates—even Catholic ones—what stance to take.

Partial Transcript:

A Freudian slip?

3:11 ~ Ted Kennedy, the brother of John and Robert Kennedy… It is alleged that he was involved with a young woman named Mary Jo Kopechne, who was also killed in an automobile accident that he claims the he could not save her, he swam to power, she-toa-toa, safety. She died there in that automobile.