POLITICALPYRO CONTRIBUTORS

Obama is negotiating surrender in Afghanistan

COINCIDENTS OF REPORTS ARGUE THAT THIS IS FACT, NOT FICTION
by John Charlton

(Nov. 23, 2009) — Obama is about to sell out for political expediency the brave troops of the American and Nato forces which have been fighting a bitter war in the mountains of Afghanistan for nearly 8 years.

The report comes from an Arabic News Agency, Al-Watan, in Saudia Arabia. Chaptomatic’s translation of the report reads as follows:

Kabul, Islamabad: (agency name)

A well-informed Afghani source confirmed details of secret discussions happening between (name?) of the Taliban movement, among them the designated minister of war, and the American ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry. (and there was agreement). The same source [said there was] complete agreement before the American ambassador party request and it resulted in US conditions for proceeding.

Ambassador Eikenberry proposed that the movement be granted sovereign power / authority in Kandahar state and Helmand and Orzkan and Kanr and Nuristan, in exchange for the ending of attacks on American bases in Afghanistan.

The Islamic Media blog, Membri Blog identifies the minister of war as Ahmad Mutawakil, the Taliban foreign minister — evidently they are the same position.

This report is unconfirmed by direct sources, but a report by the Christian Science Monitor yesterday indicates that the Pakistani government was asked by the Obama regime to sound out in support of Obama’s planned betrayal of the American and Afghan people.

Najmuddin Shaikh, formerly the top bureaucrat in the Pakistani Foreign Ministry, said the Taliban could be brought to the negotiating table if they saw a greater American military commitment and more investments in the Afghan countryside.

“It’s a little premature for talks [with the Taliban],” Shaikh said. “There has to be a change in the ground situation, things happening in the next six to eight months that shows the ‘ink spots’ strategy – [McChrystal’s idea of protecting Afghan population centers] – is taking hold, that some foot soldiers are being weaned away, then talks become possible.”

Nevertheless, behind the scenes talks with mid-level Taliban officials already have begun, and Pakistani officials think they could rapidly accelerate now that Karzai has begun his second term.

“We’ve already been talking to them [the Taliban],” said a senior Pakistani official in Islamabad, who couldn’t be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. “If the US helps the process, some arrangements can be worked out for political reconciliation. I’m not for a moment suggesting that it’s an easy task, but otherwise you will be fighting these people for the next hundred years.”

ThreatsWatch.org has issued its own enlightening commentary with many informative links on this possibility that Obama is negotiating surrender:

It would also fit in consistently with Ambassador Eikenberry’s leaked cables recently railing against a ’surge’ in forces in Afghanistan. He wouldn’t voice such without thinking he has his hands on something else. Could this be it? The surrender of 25% of Afghan territory in exchange for some form of ceasefire?

One would hope not. But if so, this demonstrated type of ‘effort’ in Afghanistan would prove to be the strongest indication that it may be time to advocate the full pullout of American forces from Afghanistan.

If this is true, then not one more drop of American blood for a path that resembles Pakistan’s path. You recall Pakistan’s series of surrenders touted as agreements, right?

Commentators on the net are indicating that if this news of negotiations between Eikenberry and Mutawakil is true, there will be immediate demands from the opposition parties in the United Kingdom, Canada and other Nato Allies for withdrawal, on the grounds that such a course of action is a slap in the face to America’s allied who have spent the blood of their own nationals for years, supporting American action in Afghanistan. The doubt alone, that this is true, will greatly weaking the alliance.

EXCLUSIVE: Secret U.S.-Israel nuclear accord in jeopardy

EXCLUSIVE:

President Obama’s efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons threaten to expose and derail a 40-year-old secret U.S. agreement to shield Israel’s nuclear weapons from international scrutiny, former and current U.S. and Israeli officials and nuclear specialists say.

The issue will likely come to a head when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets with Mr. Obama on May 18 in Washington. Mr. Netanyahu is expected to seek assurances from Mr. Obama that he will uphold the U.S. commitment and will not trade Israeli nuclear concessions for Iranian ones.

Assistant Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller, speaking Tuesday at a U.N. meeting on the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), said Israel should join the treaty, which would require Israel to declare and relinquish its nuclear arsenal.

“Universal adherence to the NPT itself, including by India, Israel, Pakistan and North Korea, … remains a fundamental objective of the United States,” Ms. Gottemoeller told the meeting, according to Reuters.

The Pyro Opinion:

Barack better to learn how to play in the sand box like a good ‘boy’ or what is left of Americas military presence and strength around the world is going to be lost.

Thanks 2 Eli Lake and The Washington Times

MORE TROOPS FORTHCOMING IN OBAMA’S BID TO BECOME DICTATOR

President Barack Obama has signed an executive order presidential determination allowing hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to settle in the United States at American taxpayers’ expense. Sure, what can go wrong when we allow hundreds of thousands of people who have been, as Mark Steyn memorably described, “marinated” in a “sick death cult,” who voted for Hamas, and 55% of whom support suicide bombing/murders in the United States. By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of $20.3 million in migration assistance to the Palestinians. Egypt won’t take them. Jordan won’t take them. Syria won’t take them. Saudi Arabia won’t take them. All of the Arab countries - every one of them - has allowed the Palestinians to fester for over 60 years. Meanwhile, generation after generation have become more and more radicalized. Their lives are unproductive - they “live” to die as martyrs - yearning for the rewards of the world beyond. The “presidential determination” will allow hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the United States. The determination was signed on January 27 and appeared in the Federal Register on February 4. President Obama’s decision, according to the Register, was necessitated by “the urgent refugee and migration needs” of the “victims.” Few on Capitol Hill took note that the order provides a free ticket replete with housing and food allowances to individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of January 2006. Wonder how long it’ll be before the U.S. is labeled a rouge country that supports terrorism

No Introduction…

The Great Recession:

Partial Transcript:

0:38 ~ Let me explain to you that this Great Recession started 1998 and will run to the year 2012.

1:48 ~ George Bush, who’s leaving office now, when he came into office in the year 2000 he inherited a recession, ahh, the beginning of a recession.. ahh, from the president at the time William Jefferson Clinton, and he issued a stimulus package in 2001 to offset the ahh, sti..thb, thb, problem with the economy.

2:10 ~ The 911 event cause the market to sag even further.

2:21 ~ And then the war with Iraq in 2003 began to boost the economy.

3:28 ~ The money (for economic stimulus) comes from the Wizard of OZ. It has no real cumulative, economic stimulus action, and though the packages make people feel good for a brief period of time.

3:55 ~ By the year 2010 America will be facing 10 to 12 percent unemployment roles.

4:16 ~ America will be in the grips of the worst financial situation that the world has ever seen and the only thing that will stop it will be a war.

4:41 ~ Israel as a nation must aggressively now, ahh, seek to divert and divest itself from American approval and it must bomb Tehran.

6:52 ~ The Reagan administration was able to have peace time prosperity, the logest and the fullest under lower tax cuts.. what Reagan called… and under also lower capital gains which fueled increased production.

I pulled this headline from Huffington online today…. sounds a bit like what those American chaps did across the pond to handle their nasty Native Indian problem in America. Only problame-o, Hamas will not be bought off with a few glass trinkets and a promise of a piece of land that resembles that of a American Indian reservation.

One of the keener things here is… that no one had ~in your chaps terms~ the backs of the Native Indians. I bet if it were to happen today, you bleeding heart Americans would see their side of things ~Native Americans~ and would be fighting for their right to be a sovereign nation.

Funny how one mans terrorism is another mans fight for what is rightfully theirs… or an act of brutally stealing what you believe to be God given. You folks called Indians savages, for the way they lived and fought. Actually, they were freedom fighters like your Reagan’s, Iran-Contra mess.

Curious how one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter… guess I suppose which side your for, doesn’t it.

Israels terroristic genocide is held by too many as a war for security… security.

Mark my words… this situation will be, what it will be, until either one is gone from that region of the world, or… reservationed into a near extinction by the World community.

Curious how things never change…

I know how you Americans enjoy your pic’s… Take a look at these.

Cheerio!