POLITICALPYRO CONTRIBUTORS

In a day where syndromes lead the way for more ‘pills and passes’ for societies around the globe, I too wanted to find a reason for the American society to adopt failed socialist health care practices. It would be nice if these failed practice that I speak of could be disputed, then I would not have to look to a psychological diagnoses, but they can not.

Time after time, example after example, it has been shown and proven that a government mandated heath care systems falls short on care, and cost much more than originally proposed. And when those in socialized medical systems go looking for care not covered by their government mandated system, they don’t go looking to other socialized medical providers… no, no they do not! When socialized medicine falls short, -and it does throughout the world- those that are able to make a choice between what is mandated or what is better or the best, look to America and her health care system. This is a fact that can not be disputed nor can it be overlooked.

As you can gleam from the information below, America has 10 to the top 12 hospitals in the world.

If this is true, then what is the problem? The problem is that a hospital and them being the best or worst is not based on the level of governmental health care your country has. Health care and health care systems are based on things such as ease of access, who and what is covered, cost, governmental involvement… Hospitals are based on technology and how those technologies are used for the overall success in specific areas of health.

Got all that, Cherio!

So, in a country of 300+ million, were over 90% of its citizens have one form of coverage, be willing to commit their souls, to insure that 18 to 26 million have continuous health coverage. And to add insult to injury, the majority not covered are illegal immigrants, and the rest could be covered by expanding the parameters of Medicaid or Medicare to include these folks. Munchausen by proxy syndrome (MBPS) is where my findings have lead me.

MBPS a relatively uncommon condition that involves the exaggeration or fabrication of illnesses or symptoms by a primary caretaker. One of the most harmful forms of child abuse, MBPS was named after Baron von Munchausen, an 18th-century German dignitary known for telling outlandish stories. In 98% of MBPS cases, the perp is a female, and victim is typically pre-school aged.

If you change the interpretation of the maternal understanding to include how government tries to fulfill what they perceive our needs to be and the methods that are used to secure the constant state of the significance they derive from this… Then you can understand why my findings have lead me to this diagnoses and syndrome.

This is to say… Because Congress appears to be so caring and attentive, often no one suspects any wrongdoing. This is a perplexing aspect of the syndrome and it is what gives the ability of the Congress to fool us by ‘misinterpreting to manipulate’ our founding fathers ideals.

Further examination of the syndrome indicates that typically, it isn’t just the attention that’s gained from the “illness” of the child that drives this behavior, but also the satisfaction in being able to deceive individuals that they consider to be more important and powerful than themselves.

Our government relies on the ‘exaggeration or fabrication of (societal) symptoms’ so that they may continue the dependency. This dependent state of existence can and will lead to the empowerment of a political party or ideal with a singularity desired for personal and idealogical empowerment. This acts as the conduit for the manifestation of the ‘exaggerated’ socially accepted condition or ideal.

When this condition is ultimately realized, it will lead us as a society to treat the body of Congress as our maternal mother and in-turn allow the manifestation of the maternal blind trust of a child like dependency. This maternal connection will signal the Congress to believe that its ideals are more important than heath or needs of the whole of the society and will continue to use that blind trust to convey a constants state of ‘exaggerated illness.’ This will allow the Congress to perpetuate the conditions of dependency and relegate the welfare of the whole to being irrelevant unless they serve a purpose to elevate the importance of the Congress.

Because Congress appears to be so caring and attentive, often no one suspects any wrongdoing. A perplexing aspect of the syndrome is the ability of the Congress to fool and manipulate us through legislation. This is to say… Frequently, Congress is familiar with the how legislation is received by most of us and what effects it will have. Also, at what lengths they will go to fooling one another into how it all serves the common good.

Even the most experienced in Congress can miss the meaning of the inconsistencies in how legislation has been applied, leading to a misinterpretation derogatory social symptoms. We have seen in our past that it’s not unusual for legislators, when faced with the consequence of legislative decisions will turn a blind eye to all that goes on, based on the belief that Congress would never deliberately hurt his or her own subjects.

So What Happens to the Citizenry?

In the most severe instances, Congress may go to great lengths to make their subjects sick or dependent. When cameras in the Senate and House of Representatives are tuned on, some Congress persons can be seen switching stories, injecting the classes with conjecture and class envy rhetoric as to cause infection, or placing misleading statements or half truths before that which is already proven.

Some Congress persons may aggravate an existing problem, such as manipulating racial or socials status so that the social consciousness can never heal. One Congress person discovered that continuously reciting misleading snippets of information would cause a baffling, long-lasting recession.

Whatever the course, the citizenry plight — whether created or faked — don’t happen when the Congress isn’t trying to use legislation for the means of social engineering or wanting to create a atmosphere of preconceived social illness and dependency. When Congress gets out of the way, we have seen periods of outstanding growth, both socially and individual. When confronted with these truths Congress usually denies knowing how the plight began or for that matter who or whom was responsible.

According to experts, common conditions and symptoms that are created or faked by Congress include: Unfair Tax System, Healthcare, Civil Rights, Leveling Playing Field, The Working Poor, Whithering on the Vine, and Educational Reform… just to name a few

The long-term prognosis for us as subjects of a more socialized society depends on the degree of damage created by Congress and the amount of time it takes to recognize, diagnose and start taking back responsibility for one self.

Obama is negotiating surrender in Afghanistan

COINCIDENTS OF REPORTS ARGUE THAT THIS IS FACT, NOT FICTION
by John Charlton

(Nov. 23, 2009) — Obama is about to sell out for political expediency the brave troops of the American and Nato forces which have been fighting a bitter war in the mountains of Afghanistan for nearly 8 years.

The report comes from an Arabic News Agency, Al-Watan, in Saudia Arabia. Chaptomatic’s translation of the report reads as follows:

Kabul, Islamabad: (agency name)

A well-informed Afghani source confirmed details of secret discussions happening between (name?) of the Taliban movement, among them the designated minister of war, and the American ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry. (and there was agreement). The same source [said there was] complete agreement before the American ambassador party request and it resulted in US conditions for proceeding.

Ambassador Eikenberry proposed that the movement be granted sovereign power / authority in Kandahar state and Helmand and Orzkan and Kanr and Nuristan, in exchange for the ending of attacks on American bases in Afghanistan.

The Islamic Media blog, Membri Blog identifies the minister of war as Ahmad Mutawakil, the Taliban foreign minister — evidently they are the same position.

This report is unconfirmed by direct sources, but a report by the Christian Science Monitor yesterday indicates that the Pakistani government was asked by the Obama regime to sound out in support of Obama’s planned betrayal of the American and Afghan people.

Najmuddin Shaikh, formerly the top bureaucrat in the Pakistani Foreign Ministry, said the Taliban could be brought to the negotiating table if they saw a greater American military commitment and more investments in the Afghan countryside.

“It’s a little premature for talks [with the Taliban],” Shaikh said. “There has to be a change in the ground situation, things happening in the next six to eight months that shows the ‘ink spots’ strategy – [McChrystal’s idea of protecting Afghan population centers] – is taking hold, that some foot soldiers are being weaned away, then talks become possible.”

Nevertheless, behind the scenes talks with mid-level Taliban officials already have begun, and Pakistani officials think they could rapidly accelerate now that Karzai has begun his second term.

“We’ve already been talking to them [the Taliban],” said a senior Pakistani official in Islamabad, who couldn’t be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. “If the US helps the process, some arrangements can be worked out for political reconciliation. I’m not for a moment suggesting that it’s an easy task, but otherwise you will be fighting these people for the next hundred years.”

ThreatsWatch.org has issued its own enlightening commentary with many informative links on this possibility that Obama is negotiating surrender:

It would also fit in consistently with Ambassador Eikenberry’s leaked cables recently railing against a ’surge’ in forces in Afghanistan. He wouldn’t voice such without thinking he has his hands on something else. Could this be it? The surrender of 25% of Afghan territory in exchange for some form of ceasefire?

One would hope not. But if so, this demonstrated type of ‘effort’ in Afghanistan would prove to be the strongest indication that it may be time to advocate the full pullout of American forces from Afghanistan.

If this is true, then not one more drop of American blood for a path that resembles Pakistan’s path. You recall Pakistan’s series of surrenders touted as agreements, right?

Commentators on the net are indicating that if this news of negotiations between Eikenberry and Mutawakil is true, there will be immediate demands from the opposition parties in the United Kingdom, Canada and other Nato Allies for withdrawal, on the grounds that such a course of action is a slap in the face to America’s allied who have spent the blood of their own nationals for years, supporting American action in Afghanistan. The doubt alone, that this is true, will greatly weaking the alliance.

Coaching Pee-Wee Football has never been so hard… I got a juicy one from the Pyro for this weekend…. Stay Tuned!

“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Mahatma Ghandi

The goal of the liberal party is to suppress capitalism to the point where the populous feels the government should takeover. -Terry Lanciotti

EXCLUSIVE: Secret U.S.-Israel nuclear accord in jeopardy

EXCLUSIVE:

President Obama’s efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons threaten to expose and derail a 40-year-old secret U.S. agreement to shield Israel’s nuclear weapons from international scrutiny, former and current U.S. and Israeli officials and nuclear specialists say.

The issue will likely come to a head when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets with Mr. Obama on May 18 in Washington. Mr. Netanyahu is expected to seek assurances from Mr. Obama that he will uphold the U.S. commitment and will not trade Israeli nuclear concessions for Iranian ones.

Assistant Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller, speaking Tuesday at a U.N. meeting on the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), said Israel should join the treaty, which would require Israel to declare and relinquish its nuclear arsenal.

“Universal adherence to the NPT itself, including by India, Israel, Pakistan and North Korea, … remains a fundamental objective of the United States,” Ms. Gottemoeller told the meeting, according to Reuters.

The Pyro Opinion:

Barack better to learn how to play in the sand box like a good ‘boy’ or what is left of Americas military presence and strength around the world is going to be lost.

Thanks 2 Eli Lake and The Washington Times

MORE TROOPS FORTHCOMING IN OBAMA’S BID TO BECOME DICTATOR

President Barack Obama has signed an executive order presidential determination allowing hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to settle in the United States at American taxpayers’ expense. Sure, what can go wrong when we allow hundreds of thousands of people who have been, as Mark Steyn memorably described, “marinated” in a “sick death cult,” who voted for Hamas, and 55% of whom support suicide bombing/murders in the United States. By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of $20.3 million in migration assistance to the Palestinians. Egypt won’t take them. Jordan won’t take them. Syria won’t take them. Saudi Arabia won’t take them. All of the Arab countries - every one of them - has allowed the Palestinians to fester for over 60 years. Meanwhile, generation after generation have become more and more radicalized. Their lives are unproductive - they “live” to die as martyrs - yearning for the rewards of the world beyond. The “presidential determination” will allow hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the United States. The determination was signed on January 27 and appeared in the Federal Register on February 4. President Obama’s decision, according to the Register, was necessitated by “the urgent refugee and migration needs” of the “victims.” Few on Capitol Hill took note that the order provides a free ticket replete with housing and food allowances to individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of January 2006. Wonder how long it’ll be before the U.S. is labeled a rouge country that supports terrorism

When it comes to controversy, I always have an opinion.

Today’s hot topic: Israeli/Arab Conflict

After the holocaust (which may or may not have existed according to the leader of Iran) the leaders of the free world decided to create a Jewish state, thereby creating a safe haven for all Jews of the world in hopes that a holocaust would never happen again.

The land used to create the nation of Israel, was the British Mandate of Palestine.

You see, all land west of the Jordan River was called “Palestine,” and all land east of the Jordan River was called “Transjordan”.

Now, the definition of “ownership” often comes into play when discussing the rightful owners of land. But as you can see from maps dating back hundreds of years, “ownership” of land across the globe changes hands year after year, war upon war. Nations are created — nations are destroyed.

So, by all means, we shall call the “rightful” owner of land: the nation with the most guns.

Clearly, in 1920, Great Britain was just that! Long live the Queen!

Now, as you see here, Transjordan became the nation of Jordan, and Palestine was proposed to be fractured into two hideously shaped, nonsensical nations. And there is your flaw!

When two separate people, divided by religious beliefs, are allowed to develop an “us and them” mentality — especially in such oddly shaped, close quarters — they are forever doomed as enemies.

In fact, ALL of the land east of the Jordan River (both orange and yellow in the above map) should have been declared “the free state of Israel,” with automatic 51% Jewish representation.

Any Arab who chose not to be a citizen of this nation at the time, should have been immediately escorted across the river to Jordan.

Any Arab who chose to stay, would enjoy a healthy 49% representation in government! Don’t think that is fair? Consider the fact that no other state in the middle east even has a democratic government at all. 49% is certainly better than 0%!

Why the 2% advantage for the Jews? Simple. Because the Jews have never vowed to wipe the Arabs off the face of the Earth. The Jews have never referred to the Arabs as “stinking corpses”.

Now let’s look at the 1949 U.N. abomination:

As you can see, all lands other than the green areas, became today’s Israel. The green areas became “West Bank” (controlled by Jordan) and “Gaza Strip” (controlled by Egypt).

What ever happened to the Arabs in the red areas? Why, they became Israelis, of course! Don’t hear much complaint from them, now do we?

Of course not! The J. Walten Dare plan is air tight! Jolly good!

Finally, we must decide what to do with the current “West Bank” and “Gaza Strip”. It is one thing to describe what should have happened, and quite another to resolve today’s issues. Quite right!

The first question we should ask, when considering the creation of a fractured Palestinian State, is: Why don’t Egypt and Jordan want their land back? Have you ever heard of a nation that didn’t want land returned to them? In fact, why did Egypt wall off Gaza just as Israel?

Ah ha! The truth is, Egypt and Jordan want nothing to do with the Palestinians! And there lies the answer to what even the Arab world thinks of the Palestinians. Uncivilized hooligans. And why not? For years, the Arabs sent their criminals to West Bank and Gaza just to get under Israel’s skin.

Therefore, one must conclude, Palestinians have no business being an independent nation.

The J. Walten Dare Plan is the only one that makes sense! Allow Israel to absorb West Bank and Gaza and let them deal with the criminal factions. Afterall, they seem to be the only ones willing to do so.

Once again, this is J. Walten Dare declaring: PROBLEM SOLVED!

Cheerio!

When it comes to controversy, I always have an opinion.

Today’s hot topic: racism

One of mankind’s most valuable instincts is the ability to survive. Back in the days of cavemen, the neighbor who helped you on the hunt was your friend. The neighbor who tried to steal your berries was your enemy.

Got that? Jolly good!

Now, the word Us referred to anyone within my group, and the word Them referred to anyone who was not. This is not to suggest that someone with Us could not act a damn fool and be banished. Quite the contrary! Survival in those days depended heavily on growing the population of Us, for security purposes, to a number larger than Them on the other side of the valley.

Now let us fast forward to about 500 A.D.

As you can see, there were quite a number of Us and Thems. Also, note the border less regions. At this time, we weren’t sufficiently civilized to draw a solid line on the map and respect each other’s territory. So anyone caught in the no man’s land in between, might end up with a sword in his belly. Bloody Hell!

Now, let us fast forward once again to about 1500 A.D.

The first thing you will notice is that the number of Us and Thems grew exponentially. By now, these groups were organised as Nations.

Lastly, here is 1700 A.D.

One thing you might note: England early on organized their territory much sooner than the other Euro-trash did. No doubt all that water helped! But, what does any of this have to do with racism? Ah ha! Glad you asked!

You see, within each individual nation there developed a mental, physical, spiritual, and linguistic community. A fabric, if you will. The longer one lived in England, for example, the stranger Denmark would seem. As populations within a single nation mixed, skin tones were neutralized and language was born.

This is why you can go to that abominable Ireland today and not be able to tell one bloody Irishman from the next! God Save the Queen!

Racism (or any other ism you can think of) was a natural way for one group of people to protect itself from another. Plain and simple. Should a bloody Irishman in 1500 A.D., sitting in a pub, look up to see an olive-skinned Italian walking in, he would use his natural racist survival instincts to warn the others that the Romans have come to steal their berries!

So there you are! Racism in its simplest form is nothing more than survival instincts! Nothing more whatsoever. One would have to be quite stupid not to be racist in those days, eh wat?!

Yet, how does this apply to today’s modern society, you might ask. Jolly good question!

In the early 20th century, the United States became the first nation to create a national fabric based on immigration, or the mingling of races. By all standards, this was risky business. An anomaly, if you will.

No nation had ever had any good come from mingling with another. Yet, the American secret in this diabolical plan was the act of assimilation.

You see, when one would assimilate into the fabric of society — speak the language, live and work next to each other — as in the American experiment, one’s natural instincts toward the isms were expected to be stymied with time.

But, as I have stated above, the act of assimilation is crucial.

This trend of assimilation has done wonders for the modern world! In fact, England and the rest of Europe have taken on this experiment upon the success of the Americans. It is the fastest way to grow one’s population for security purposes against those nations on the other side of the valley, if you will.

Yet today, friction between different-looking people still exists. Now why might that be?

Quite simply, because the instinct of thousands of years is quite difficult to overcome simply for the appeasement of the politically correct. Full assimilation is crucial to a harmonious society bent on mingling people of different races, yet today, we are faced with people trying to change who we are in order to appease them. In other words, foreign elements are immigrating into established societies and refusing to assimilate! In fact, they are demanding their host nation adhere to their traditions! Quite rude!

Any time mingling groups choose to live closely, yet refuse to assimilate (such as the French-Muslim clash a few years ago) one has a recipe for disaster.

And therein lies the modern form of racism. Quite simply, it is a newer strain of the old instinct for survival. This new strain of racism does not bother with colour or religion at all, though it may seem that way at first. It evolves from attitude. Attitudism is best defined as a conscious decision to go against the harmony of a civilized nation, or the refusal to co-exist peacefully with a majority. (Note in the above picture that the white chap with dreads and the Islamic skin-headed chap appear to be on the same team.)

Attitudism might best explain why a white man can mow his lawn next to a black man or a Muslim across the street doing the same, yet drive across the railroad tracks and snear at the common white trash living in trailer parks. This is not to be confused with so-called class differences, either. The dweller of this small cottage would not merit a snear…

So the next time someone calls you a racist for snearing at a black man in a hoody walking a Pit Bull and selling crack, tell them they are wrong.

Racism may in fact have been replaced by the modern Attitudism, but Isms in general will never die so long as mankind retains his instinct for survival. Regardless of what the women on The View might think.

Once again, this is J. Walten Dare declaring: PROBLEM SOLVED!

Cheerio!

No Introduction…

The Great Recession:

Partial Transcript:

0:38 ~ Let me explain to you that this Great Recession started 1998 and will run to the year 2012.

1:48 ~ George Bush, who’s leaving office now, when he came into office in the year 2000 he inherited a recession, ahh, the beginning of a recession.. ahh, from the president at the time William Jefferson Clinton, and he issued a stimulus package in 2001 to offset the ahh, sti..thb, thb, problem with the economy.

2:10 ~ The 911 event cause the market to sag even further.

2:21 ~ And then the war with Iraq in 2003 began to boost the economy.

3:28 ~ The money (for economic stimulus) comes from the Wizard of OZ. It has no real cumulative, economic stimulus action, and though the packages make people feel good for a brief period of time.

3:55 ~ By the year 2010 America will be facing 10 to 12 percent unemployment roles.

4:16 ~ America will be in the grips of the worst financial situation that the world has ever seen and the only thing that will stop it will be a war.

4:41 ~ Israel as a nation must aggressively now, ahh, seek to divert and divest itself from American approval and it must bomb Tehran.

6:52 ~ The Reagan administration was able to have peace time prosperity, the logest and the fullest under lower tax cuts.. what Reagan called… and under also lower capital gains which fueled increased production.

I pulled this headline from Huffington online today…. sounds a bit like what those American chaps did across the pond to handle their nasty Native Indian problem in America. Only problame-o, Hamas will not be bought off with a few glass trinkets and a promise of a piece of land that resembles that of a American Indian reservation.

One of the keener things here is… that no one had ~in your chaps terms~ the backs of the Native Indians. I bet if it were to happen today, you bleeding heart Americans would see their side of things ~Native Americans~ and would be fighting for their right to be a sovereign nation.

Funny how one mans terrorism is another mans fight for what is rightfully theirs… or an act of brutally stealing what you believe to be God given. You folks called Indians savages, for the way they lived and fought. Actually, they were freedom fighters like your Reagan’s, Iran-Contra mess.

Curious how one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter… guess I suppose which side your for, doesn’t it.

Israels terroristic genocide is held by too many as a war for security… security.

Mark my words… this situation will be, what it will be, until either one is gone from that region of the world, or… reservationed into a near extinction by the World community.

Curious how things never change…

I know how you Americans enjoy your pic’s… Take a look at these.

Cheerio!

When it comes to controversy, I always have an opinion.

Today’s hot topic: gay marriage.

In the ever-increasing drama over marriage, many gay Americans find themselves staunchly defending their position — whether it’s bareback, missionary-style, or strictly oral.

Today, we shall attempt to unearth the truth behind the recent firestorm ignited by California’s Proposition 8.

Personally, I find the whole thing positively absurd. Marriage is an institution — a unique club, if you will. It was created by heterosexuals thousands of years ago as a celebration of the union between a man and a woman.

Today, homosexuals in America receive the greatest protection and acceptance than at any other time in history. As a matter of fact, most heterosexuals have neither a problem with gay people nor their desire to be recognized in a union.

The problem arises in the sharing of the title, “Marriage”.

You see, “Donald Trump” and “Oprah Winfrey” are unique titles as well. One does not need to share their particular title in order to be recognized as equal. “Joe Smith” or “Jane McGillicuddy” will work just as nicely in America.

Likewise, changing your name to “Donald Trump” or “Oprah Winfrey” will not entitle you to their talents nor their bank accounts… you will always be You deep down inside.

Now that we have titles down, hopefully you recognize that it isn’t important what we call ourselves, just that titles are unique qualifiers that help us differentiate between one and another. And that isn’t a bad thing. Can you imagine calling for a dog in a room full of “Rovers”? Silly now, isn’t it!

Finally, for those of you who insist on putting salt in the pepper shaker, think about this: Do you really think the salt shaker is any less valuable? Or do you secretly think that salt, once safely inside, magically turns into pepper?

Or truthfully now — do you simply want to force the world to eat your spepper?

Cheerio! Jolly good!