POLITICALPYRO CONTRIBUTORS

Was it Hillary or Holder? Or can we chalk it up to the ‘New World Order’ and Obama’s attempt to rearrange the deck chairs once again.

The old conspiracy theory is true, I know it now. That is why the Bushies and the Clintons are so chummy. The Bilderberger group and the banks truly do own the world. This would explain Switzerland folding too. France folding to American pressure simply does not happen.

I smell a rat.

Hitler was failed art student. Yet so are millions. Most create as a means of expression. Hitler created as a vessel for adulation. When he did not earn respect he sought it by force.

Throughout history nations have endured the egos of dictators. Yet those like Castro and Kim Jung Ill stemmed from a military uprising that involved thousands.

Without doubt, their egos developed later but their beginnings were humble and even today both men dress plainly because they still have a genuine belief that they are one of the people.

Even Pinochet Duvalier and Mao Tse Tung never shed the military uniform that served as a symbolic reminder of the genuine movements that propelled them to and unlikely existance of power.

Seeing themselves as some sort of royalty, these dictators took on the image of having a divine purpose to their existance. Royalty throughout history created dictatorships not derived from ego of the individual but from a people’s desire to be lead by divinity. A King was informed of this divinity at birth and later comes to believe (if not sacked first) it his God chosen place among the masses.

Hitler, Stalin, Obama… are all different men. They were not propelled by the sort of revolution we have come to understand as Americans. No, not at all… Each man fed on the fears -like vultures- and fomented distrust by predicting mass carnage across a great people. Thus, filling the vacuum created with the idea of Hope and that change was said to be caused by governance that was flawed.

Spooking a trouble nation for the purposes of feeding their egos and in turn pulling out of thin air a clarion call for radical change. In short they created chaos where none could be found as a means to power.

Lenin despised Stalin who supported Trotsky. Stalin simply eliminated Trotsky by assassination. Obama eliminated Palmer by nullifying her eligibility.

Stalin eliminated his opponent then silenced the majority with fear. Obama lost the popular vote to Hilary Clinton but used his foot soldiers (The Hopians) to organize the Super Delegates.

Obamas ego like Hitlers is nothing more than a mask to hide a lifelong crisis of his true identity. Torn by opposing colors and religious zealots, Obama has chosen to forge his own identity through Jeremiah Wright and Michelle Robinson.

Yet his homosexuality developed from the need to seek a father figure. In Michelle he found the axis that squashed these homosexual leaning. Her strong minded militant black perspective gave Obama a sense of masculinity. It would be akin to dating Jodie Foster.

In all… Hitler found that the contrived adulation of his people was not enough. Then he needed to destroy those not like him, then he needed more love from Poland, Denmark then France…

This is where all short lived dictators loose their way. Hitlers ego was his driving force. Castro on the other hand never let his ego consume him. Castro knew when enough was enough and how to paralyze an nation but still make it social conscious believe that it was able to still walk and run.

What we as American should fear is that when Obama learns that his adulation stems from his false self, he will become lethal. He is too weak to tell us who the man behind the curtain is. He expects us to continually guess what shape his persona will take and he will punish those who don’t.

Like a balloon that never stabilizes, Obama -like Hitler- will rise to self destruction.

Digesting the efforts of Obama to look presidential and patriotic I noted a few things that need to be said.

Why lay a wreath at the Pentagon and not at Ground Zero in NYC?

Why is Obama continually searching for a way to dilute this day (9-11) His most recent action would have us use this day as a day of service. What? 3000 people died so he goes and paints some colored persons kitchen.

The VP of my company said I have the couth of a truck driver… SO let me say this.

Many family’s have at one time or another experienced a tragedy that is remembered by family and friends at certain times of the year. In those years too follow some my get depressed on personal days like birthdays or anniversaries.

My sister experiences this each year on the day our dad died and his birthday. I use this example to point out the fallacy of Obama and his day of service. If Obama had asked my sister to go clean a highway (our father was killed by a head on collision) on those days that she was feeling down in remembering of our father she would have smacked his purple lipped face.

He painted because he is thinking if the buildings, not the people. Had he visited an orphanage or hospital I might not have so much contempt for his sorry socialist ass.

The Pyro still goes without basic Internet service… But, from time to time he will text message me and unload a few thoughts or ask me what I would like him to comment on. Today you will be treated to his latest cynical rant…. Ted Kennedy.

When others speak about Ted they look at his so called ‘contributions’ rather than his character as a human being. Ted’s unwillingness to resign is key when assessing this.

Like Woodrow Wilson whose wife ran the country for over a year when he was incapacitated by a stroke… Kennedy clung on to his power tighter than his own wheelchair when bouncers from the local titty bar were hired to lift the senators fat ass on and off his majesty’s royal yacht.

It has been rumored but not confirmed that during the inaugural when Teddy suffered a massive seizure someone managed to stick a pen in his gin filled mouth to get a signature for the pending Health Care takeover.

Even in death Kennedy still retains his power to sign legislation… aids have been seen placing documents over his grave for 2 drops of alcohol that percolates from the gin soaked soil above his coffin.

These drops, like the drool from the corners of Wilson’s paralyzed mouth will serve as an official signature until his replacement can be named in 2025, when the grave is expected to run dry.

Any senator with any regard for his constituents would have allowed the people to name a replacement the second he was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer.

But not Teddy. He was only loyal to himself.

The way you can tell that Teddy sucked as a human and a politician is that he never ate a bullet. It would have been a waste of metal.

As his brothers lay in their graves, done in by the hands of hired mob assassins… Teddy was given a pass for his grandfathers gangster days as a rum runner… As Joe amassed blood money that fueled the ambitions of his corrupt, power motivated doings. The irresponsible behavior that surrounded Teddy’s life style was SOP.

This is why Teddy saw himself as immortal… He thought he could buy his way out of death.

So the senate seat now remains vacant, as so do the eyes of Mary Jo Kopechne, amidst the ruins created by a man whose legacy was merely to create a pile of human wreckage for someone else to sort through and clean up.

After the success of Mary Jo’s demise, Ted Kennedy elected himself Mayor of Cooterville and stamped his way through fifths of Jack Daniels and a populace of pussy.

He was so far down the tit line he had to suck his moms asshole.

Sorry ass Commie Fuck! Never worked a day in this life. He should be deader.

America’s Pioneers forged a western path across the ocean from Europe and kept moving until they reached the end of land at the pacific ocean. Their only mission was to seek freedom. To getaway from the oppression of kings and politicians with power who sought nothing more than gaining more and more.

Now our whole country lines up to sell their souls in order to rescue one phantom figure, read about on a teleprompter by some half breed black man who promises to make life better in Boise Idaho for some buck tooth inbred, who decided the Discovery channel was more important than Blue Cross & Blue Shield. Makes me sick!

And this Rahm Emmanuel, a Jew who stabs a steak knife in the table to accentuate the importance of a bill up for vote in Illinois, the Chicago way, obsessed with retaining power for the machine, now in the shadows stabbing behind the curtains in Washington DC, with congress bleeding the streets red with their liberal hearts and Obamas Marxist agenda. This is kill’n me!

I just want a national hug a black person day so Americans suffering from white guilt never again elect some Soviet styled chocolate clown in order to appease their unduly guilty consciences borne the day Thomas Jefferson decided to step outside and fornicate with some crack whore picking his cotton. This national suicide must end!

Watch the Travel channel. Look at Zimbabwe. This is the black mans achievements undaunted by the white man’s greed running a world in need. Shut up Barry!

Glad I got that off my chest.

‘The Cause of My Life’> This is what Ted Kennedy deems his calling.
Inside the fight for universal health care.

>Click Here for the Link<

You know what Americas problem is? Its people like Ted Kennedy. Here is a murderous, rapist, drunken, drug using, scandalous, and lets not forget… privileged family with no end insight of ever spending its ill gotten family fortune and they want to give us something that he wouldn’t even use. Hey Ted, watch this video and tell me… Why should I trust you?

When the party of free lovin’ meth-mouth transvestites, five minute abortions, prekindergarten with condoms, and generally any American who tends to take it up the ass on a regular basis suddenly feigns “offense” to teenage pregnancy – I know I have fallen through the proverbial rabbit hole.

THE PYRO IS BACK!

“Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often, the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms.”

No Barry… forty-three. Grover Cleveland is only one man. We’re watching you. Don’t screw up again…

Once we mocked societies without individuality:

Today, we embrace it. The neutralization of the individual is underway.

I am reminded of this because of Roger Ebert’s review of the new David Fincher movie, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, in which Ebert touches on the absurdity of the premise where the main character is born old and dies young. The distraction of such a jarring premise made Ebert give the film a mediocre review. Here is what he said:

As I watched the film, I became consumed by a conviction that this was simply wrong.

Let me paraphrase the oldest story I know: In the beginning, there was nothing, and then God said, “Let there be light.” Everything comes after the beginning, and we all seem to share this awareness of the direction of time’s arrow. There is a famous line by e.e. cummings that might seem to apply to Benjamin Button: and down he forgot as up he grew. But no, it involves the process of forgetting our youth as we grow older.

Yet, there seems to more to the premise than perhaps Ebert has digested. American society, in many instances, has digressed.

Don’t believe me? Just watch these clips of popular seventies sitcom icons Archie Bunker and George Jefferson. What was acceptable for viewing thirty years ago has suddenly become “too insensitive” for today’s audiences. Today, TVLand either avoids these episodes all-together, or censors the offending jargon. Listen to the live studio audience’s reaction to the antics of the main characters — then judge against your own gut instinct as to what “we” are able to endure.

“England is a Fag Country”:

“Lionel’s Wedding”:

Have we outgrown our sensitivities toward racial slurs just as we outgrew our inability to say the word “pregnant” on TV? Or our inability to watch a TV couple sleep in the same bed? Or have we simply outlawed racial slurs by wishing they would go away? And what is the result? Have we toughened up against them, rendering them obsolete? Or have we magnified their offensiveness, yielding them unprecedented power over us?

While the collective “we” are apparently mature enough to watch rape and murder — and listen to an endless barrage of four-letter words that have slowly crept into our television lexicon — we suddenly have lost our stomachs for what Lenny Bruce referred to as “the what is”, preferring instead “the what should be.”

The election of Barack Obama has solidified this trend toward economic Socialism (forced equality of the minority) at the expense of personal freedom and individuality (neutralization of the majority). The current Socialist premise embraced in America today is that minorities are “equal” to the majority of Americans. Equal how? In other words, differences of race, religion, and sexual preference (age has yet to secure a place underneath this sheltering umbrella) are not to be identified, simply ignored (i.e. racial profiling)

Yet, a major question of this core Liberal/Socialist strategy continues to gnaw at me: How are we expected to embrace diversity while at the same time we are forbidden by the politically correct etiquette police from even acknowledging its existence in the first place?

Should I act to embrace the presence of my new African American neighbor? At once I am fulfilling the Socialist agenda of embracing diversity — while, at the same time, I am a racist for acknowledging their physical differences.

Banning of terms — such as George Jefferson’s beloved “whitey,” “honkey,” or “nigger” — does nothing to promote minority acceptance in today’s society. It only promotes an increasingly sensitive society forever doomed to walk on eggshells in each others’ presence out of fear we might say something offensive.

The meek shall truly inherit the Earth.

The origin of human beings questioning the existence of God might be traced back to the first cave dweller who gazed upon the moon. Today, as I ponder, I have the benefit of incorporating into my thoughts a multitude of scientific facts generated by thousands of great minds before me who in turn, but admittedly with far greater intellect, had built their own knowledge from earlier masters like brick upon brick. My own knowledge without studying the books of scientists and philosophers would probably be no greater than the cave dweller’s, but my place in the advancement of human intelligence over the past 200,000 years gives me a far greater advantage.

Those who do not believe in God’s existence, Atheist and agnostic, cannot produce the scientific evidence to support their claim. Likewise, those who believe in an almighty God similar to the one depicted by various religions around the world have yet to provide a single shred of solid evidence since the inception of organized religion. The result of these two polar opposite schools of thinking has been the cause of many heated debates over the past two millennia which continue to this day in stalemate.

The theory of abiogenesis, or the origin of life from non-living substances, is not a proven fact at this time, yet continues to progress as scientists in 2002 created a viral substance from non-living matter that was powerful enough to kill laboratory mice. One day, scientists may be able to unlock the secrets to the origins of life that will explain how civilization came from non-living substances. If they succeed, they still do not disprove God’s existence.

Perhaps they will simply justify it.

In 1964, the Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev first introduced a general method for classifying intelligent civilizations. Type I civilizations, he proposed, could harness all the power of a single planet. Type II civilizations could harness all the power of a star. Type III civilizations, Kardashev suggested, could harness all the power of a galaxy.

Regardless of the details of Kardashev’s scale, the basic point of his theory illustrating the advancement of civilization brings to mind the scientific fact that, aside from catastrophic events that might bring about our extinction, human beings are on course to becoming God-like in power and intelligence.

Philosopher Bertrand Russell once noted, “All the labors of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and the whole temple of Man’s achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruins”.

Yet, beyond Nikolai Kardashev’s Type III civilization, according to logic, would be Type IV, Type V, and beyond to the power of infinity. Somewhere in that time frame of advancing civilization is intelligence that today we can only perceive as “God”. It is intelligence beyond our current comprehension, and possibly a solution to Russell’s “inevitable” dilemma: Perhaps we will harness the power to escape a dying universe — or simply create a new one.

At some point in time, humans may cease to die due to the advancement of medical and scientific technology, but regardless of our fate as individuals, as a collective whole we can be immortal. With our ability to harness the power of an entire galaxy, perhaps we will also possess the ability to create new life forms in galaxies beyond the Milky Way. The possibilities are endless, but the combination of intelligence plus time is a simple mathematical certainty.

On the other hand, science fiction has shown us the fantastic possibilities of the universe through great theorists such as Carl Sagan, who pondered the possibility of a civilization millions of years more advanced than our own. How about the possibility of billions?

Earth is generally believed to be 4.5 billion years old in a universe that has existed for 13.7 billion years — meaning 9.2 billion pre-Earth years. Great civilizations might have existed long before Earth was formed. Perhaps one of those civilizations is what we perceive to be “God”.

Even if one does not believe in such civilizations, one cannot deny the existence of our own. The evidence has been right under our noses since the first cave dweller gazed upon the moon…The evidence of God is in us.

Merry Christmas 2008 — Political Pyro

When you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas.

Barack Obama’s sudden rise through the Chicago political machine to national prominence, and now the White House, leaves many skeptics scratching their heads as to just how involved Obama may or may not have been in the sleazy dealings of the Chicago political underworld.

Illinois Senator Paul Simon and Governor Adlai Stevenson are two examples of squeaky-clean, 20th century politicians who managed to scrape their way through the machine to the national level without so much as buggering up their bow-ties, so to automatically assume that such a venture is not possible for Obama is a terrible disservice to those gentlemen.

The general consensus is that Obama did just that.

Yet, when Patrick Fitzgerald arrested Governor Rod Blagojevich in the early hours of Tuesday the 9th, many who initially hailed the zealous prosecutor for disrupting the notorious Chicago machine “in the middle of a crime spree,” soon began to set their sights on Obama and Company.

The initial knee-jerk reaction is common in journalism, and in no way implies any wrongdoing on the part of the Obama administration. For a fleeting moment, it appeared that reporters were finally willing to do their jobs and ask the President-elect some tough questions.

The response? Like shining a searchlight in an abandoned tenement kitchen.

Obama immediately stated that he had had no contact with Blagojevich concerning the Senate seat he leaves vacant, despite the fact that no such conversation would be considered unethical in any way. As a result, David Axelrod was forced to rescind his earlier statement claiming that Obama in fact had spoken with the governor. Rahm Emanuel suddenly made himself unavailable for questioning as it became widely understood he was the one doing all the communicating.

So why all the retracted statements? Why the guilty consciences?

The press has been all too eager to paint Blagojevich as a raving lunatic, but it merely underscores their willingness to throw him under the bus in order to protect Barack Obama. This should be expected from liberal media outlets, such as The New York Times, intent on reducing the governor’s credibility to that of a syphilis-ridden prostitute suffering the latter stages of dementia. But it only raises questions as to why the president-elect would need such protection if he is as squeaky clean as we are being lead to believe.

On October 17, 2008, the Chicago Tribune had this to say in their endorsement of Barack Obama for president:

On Dec. 6, 2006, this page encouraged Obama to join the presidential campaign. We wrote that he would celebrate our common values instead of exaggerate our differences. We said he would raise the tone of the campaign. We said his intellectual depth would sharpen the policy debate. In the ensuing 22 months he has done just that.

Many Americans say they’re uneasy about Obama. He’s pretty new to them.

We can provide some assurance. We have known Obama since he entered politics a dozen years ago. We have watched him, worked with him, argued with him as he rose from an effective state senator to an inspiring U.S. senator to the Democratic Party’s nominee for president.

On December 14, 2008, The Wall Street Journal wrote this about the Blagojevich investigation:

Conventional wisdom holds that U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald ordered the FBI to arrest Rod Blagojevich before sunrise Tuesday in order to stop a crime from being committed. That would have been the sale of the Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama.

But the opposite is true: Members of Fitzgerald’s team are livid the scheme didn’t advance, at least for a little longer, according to some people close to Fitzgerald’s office. Why? Because had the plot unfolded, they might have had an opportunity most feds can only dream of: A chance to catch the sale of a Senate seat on tape, including the sellers and the buyers.

The precise timing of Tuesday’s dramatic, pre-dawn arrest was not dictated by Fitzgerald, nor was it dictated by the pace of Blagojevich’s alleged “crime spree”. It was dictated by the Chicago Tribune, according to people close to the investigation and a careful reading of the FBI’s affidavit in the case.

Today, The New York Times reports:

When Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the United States attorney in Chicago, announced the arrest of the Illinois governor, Rod R. Blagojevich, Mr. Fitzgerald said he had acted to halt a political crime spree that included what he called an “appalling” effort to sell off the Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama.

But now some lawyers are beginning to suggest that the juiciest part of the case against Mr. Blagojevich, the part involving the Senate seat, may be less than airtight. There is no evidence, at least none that has been disclosed, that the governor actually received anything of value — and the Senate appointment has yet to be made.

In dealing with The Chicago Tribune, it seems Fitzgerald’s entire hand had been exposed to a newspaper whose connections within the machine remain unknown. Afterall, somebody tipped off Obama, who withdrew his preferred candidate, Valerie Jarrett, before the Tribune took it upon themselves to bust the investigation wide open on December 5th.

One suggestion for Fitzgerald the next time he deals with the Chicago Tribune in an investigation surrounding the presidential candidate they have endorsed: bug their offices first.

Current political score and predicted outcome: Chicago Machine, 1 — Justice, 0

Forget It, Fitz…….. It’s Chi-Town.

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)