POLITICALPYRO CONTRIBUTORS

Hopians have attacked at will the basic foundation of an American society and now the backlash is starting to be felt by the Obama administration and to his loyal subjects.

Obama and his visions of Hope is often portrayed as an apocalyptic and seismic break with our White European ideals and capitalistic history. Yet the truth is that it is the culmination and reification of European (and American) history in the 20th century. The United States connection too colonialism have prepared it for a wide range of phenomena associated with Obamas vision of Hope. This is what I now deem as the Hopian regime of the Obama Empire- from Muslim motivated terrorist murders to racial theories, from white European slave owners to the forcible annexation of Capitalism.

Moreover, a inside look at Obama and his Hopian views can suggest that it was innovated by applying prevailing racial theories (usually reserved only-whites) to the black race itself. It started with attacking those that objected to Obamas inexperience as being closet racists and denouncing religious black leaders - a non-controversial proposition - but then expanded them to include Christianity and all other forms of religion that were in contradiction to the of Hopian laws of socialist freedoms.

Hopian - and Fascism, Socialism - Obama and his ‘third world’ ideologies, adopted enthusiastically in places as diverse as Iowa, New Hampshire, and the Carolinas. It was clear by the middle of Obamas campaign that liberal capitalism, communism, and fascism (and its mutations) were locked in mortal battle of ideologies. Obamas mistake was to delusional believe in the affinity between capitalism and Americanism. But this affinity was a part of our collective DNA as a nation - and this affinity enhanced, in his mind, by Americas distrust of corporatism and by the existence of a imaginary common enemy: Capitalist Corporate Greed.

It is no wonder that the Hopian socialist movement has possessed all the hallmarks of an institutional religion: priesthood, rites, rituals, temples, worship, catechism, mythology and now school room indoctrination. Obama has deemed himself a religious ascetic saint and supreme thought provider.

Obama monastically denies himself common White European Capitalist pleasures (or so he claimed) in order to be able to dedicate himself fully to his calling. Obama is a monstrously inverted Jesus, sacrificing his life and denying himself so that humanity should benefit. By surpassing and suppressing his humanity, Obama has became a distorted contradiction and a version of embodiment of the Second Coming.

It is an aesthetic of decadence and evil (though it was not perceived this way by Obama), carefully orchestrated, and artificial. The Hopian view is about reproduced copies, not about originals. It was about the manipulation of symbols - not about veritable atavism.

In short: The Hopian is about theater, not about life. To enjoy the spectacle (and be subsumed by it), Obamas vision demands the suspension of judgment, depersonalization, and de-realization. The cleansing of American Capitalism is tantamount, in Hopian dramaturgy, to self-annulment. The Hopian is nihilistic not only operationally, or ideologically. Its very language and narratives were nihilistic. The Hopian is conspicuous nihilism - and Obama served as a role model, annihilating Obama the Man, only to re-appear as Obama the Saviour.

Obama used ‘white guilt’ and the systematic repression of blacks as a rebellion call against the “old ways” - against the assimilation culture, the upper classes, the established religions, the Capitalistic system, our leading Superpower status. The Hopians took the Leninist vocabulary and assimilated it effectively. The burgeoning movement, a reaction to narcissistic injuries inflicted upon the narcissistic upbringing of Obama . Obama himself is malignant narcissist, as too was Hitler.

The over abundance and self deprecating over indulgences of Capitalism constituted a perfect, easily identifiable, embodiment of all that was “wrong” with America. We were an old nation, with old ‘White European’ ideals that could be eerily dismissed as evil, they were slothful, they were part of the establishment, they were “decadent”, they were hated on religious and socio-economic grounds, they were different, they were greedy, they were morally superior, they were everywhere, they were defenseless, they were credulous, they were adaptable . They were the perfect hated father figure and parricide was in fashion.

This is precisely the source of the fascination with Obama. He was an inverted human. His unconscious was his conscious. He acted out our most repressed drives, fantasies, and wishes. He provides us with a glimpse of the horrors that lie beneath the veneer, the barbarians at our personal gates, and what it was like before we invented civilization.

Obama forced us all through The Looking Glass and many did not emerge. He is not the devil. He is one of us. He is the banality of evil. Just an ordinary, mentally disturbed, failure, and member of a mentally disturbed and failing political party, who lives in disturbed and failing times. He is the perfect mirror, a channel, and voice, for the very reasons why, more than ever, we as a nation have a reason to recapture those American ideals that set us free as a nation, and to reclaim those those ‘God given’ rights that pour from the very depth of our souls.

When it comes to controversy, I always have an opinion.

Today’s hot topic: Israeli/Arab Conflict

After the holocaust (which may or may not have existed according to the leader of Iran) the leaders of the free world decided to create a Jewish state, thereby creating a safe haven for all Jews of the world in hopes that a holocaust would never happen again.

The land used to create the nation of Israel, was the British Mandate of Palestine.

You see, all land west of the Jordan River was called “Palestine,” and all land east of the Jordan River was called “Transjordan”.

Now, the definition of “ownership” often comes into play when discussing the rightful owners of land. But as you can see from maps dating back hundreds of years, “ownership” of land across the globe changes hands year after year, war upon war. Nations are created — nations are destroyed.

So, by all means, we shall call the “rightful” owner of land: the nation with the most guns.

Clearly, in 1920, Great Britain was just that! Long live the Queen!

Now, as you see here, Transjordan became the nation of Jordan, and Palestine was proposed to be fractured into two hideously shaped, nonsensical nations. And there is your flaw!

When two separate people, divided by religious beliefs, are allowed to develop an “us and them” mentality — especially in such oddly shaped, close quarters — they are forever doomed as enemies.

In fact, ALL of the land east of the Jordan River (both orange and yellow in the above map) should have been declared “the free state of Israel,” with automatic 51% Jewish representation.

Any Arab who chose not to be a citizen of this nation at the time, should have been immediately escorted across the river to Jordan.

Any Arab who chose to stay, would enjoy a healthy 49% representation in government! Don’t think that is fair? Consider the fact that no other state in the middle east even has a democratic government at all. 49% is certainly better than 0%!

Why the 2% advantage for the Jews? Simple. Because the Jews have never vowed to wipe the Arabs off the face of the Earth. The Jews have never referred to the Arabs as “stinking corpses”.

Now let’s look at the 1949 U.N. abomination:

As you can see, all lands other than the green areas, became today’s Israel. The green areas became “West Bank” (controlled by Jordan) and “Gaza Strip” (controlled by Egypt).

What ever happened to the Arabs in the red areas? Why, they became Israelis, of course! Don’t hear much complaint from them, now do we?

Of course not! The J. Walten Dare plan is air tight! Jolly good!

Finally, we must decide what to do with the current “West Bank” and “Gaza Strip”. It is one thing to describe what should have happened, and quite another to resolve today’s issues. Quite right!

The first question we should ask, when considering the creation of a fractured Palestinian State, is: Why don’t Egypt and Jordan want their land back? Have you ever heard of a nation that didn’t want land returned to them? In fact, why did Egypt wall off Gaza just as Israel?

Ah ha! The truth is, Egypt and Jordan want nothing to do with the Palestinians! And there lies the answer to what even the Arab world thinks of the Palestinians. Uncivilized hooligans. And why not? For years, the Arabs sent their criminals to West Bank and Gaza just to get under Israel’s skin.

Therefore, one must conclude, Palestinians have no business being an independent nation.

The J. Walten Dare Plan is the only one that makes sense! Allow Israel to absorb West Bank and Gaza and let them deal with the criminal factions. Afterall, they seem to be the only ones willing to do so.

Once again, this is J. Walten Dare declaring: PROBLEM SOLVED!

Cheerio!

When it comes to controversy, I always have an opinion.

Today’s hot topic: racism

One of mankind’s most valuable instincts is the ability to survive. Back in the days of cavemen, the neighbor who helped you on the hunt was your friend. The neighbor who tried to steal your berries was your enemy.

Got that? Jolly good!

Now, the word Us referred to anyone within my group, and the word Them referred to anyone who was not. This is not to suggest that someone with Us could not act a damn fool and be banished. Quite the contrary! Survival in those days depended heavily on growing the population of Us, for security purposes, to a number larger than Them on the other side of the valley.

Now let us fast forward to about 500 A.D.

As you can see, there were quite a number of Us and Thems. Also, note the border less regions. At this time, we weren’t sufficiently civilized to draw a solid line on the map and respect each other’s territory. So anyone caught in the no man’s land in between, might end up with a sword in his belly. Bloody Hell!

Now, let us fast forward once again to about 1500 A.D.

The first thing you will notice is that the number of Us and Thems grew exponentially. By now, these groups were organised as Nations.

Lastly, here is 1700 A.D.

One thing you might note: England early on organized their territory much sooner than the other Euro-trash did. No doubt all that water helped! But, what does any of this have to do with racism? Ah ha! Glad you asked!

You see, within each individual nation there developed a mental, physical, spiritual, and linguistic community. A fabric, if you will. The longer one lived in England, for example, the stranger Denmark would seem. As populations within a single nation mixed, skin tones were neutralized and language was born.

This is why you can go to that abominable Ireland today and not be able to tell one bloody Irishman from the next! God Save the Queen!

Racism (or any other ism you can think of) was a natural way for one group of people to protect itself from another. Plain and simple. Should a bloody Irishman in 1500 A.D., sitting in a pub, look up to see an olive-skinned Italian walking in, he would use his natural racist survival instincts to warn the others that the Romans have come to steal their berries!

So there you are! Racism in its simplest form is nothing more than survival instincts! Nothing more whatsoever. One would have to be quite stupid not to be racist in those days, eh wat?!

Yet, how does this apply to today’s modern society, you might ask. Jolly good question!

In the early 20th century, the United States became the first nation to create a national fabric based on immigration, or the mingling of races. By all standards, this was risky business. An anomaly, if you will.

No nation had ever had any good come from mingling with another. Yet, the American secret in this diabolical plan was the act of assimilation.

You see, when one would assimilate into the fabric of society — speak the language, live and work next to each other — as in the American experiment, one’s natural instincts toward the isms were expected to be stymied with time.

But, as I have stated above, the act of assimilation is crucial.

This trend of assimilation has done wonders for the modern world! In fact, England and the rest of Europe have taken on this experiment upon the success of the Americans. It is the fastest way to grow one’s population for security purposes against those nations on the other side of the valley, if you will.

Yet today, friction between different-looking people still exists. Now why might that be?

Quite simply, because the instinct of thousands of years is quite difficult to overcome simply for the appeasement of the politically correct. Full assimilation is crucial to a harmonious society bent on mingling people of different races, yet today, we are faced with people trying to change who we are in order to appease them. In other words, foreign elements are immigrating into established societies and refusing to assimilate! In fact, they are demanding their host nation adhere to their traditions! Quite rude!

Any time mingling groups choose to live closely, yet refuse to assimilate (such as the French-Muslim clash a few years ago) one has a recipe for disaster.

And therein lies the modern form of racism. Quite simply, it is a newer strain of the old instinct for survival. This new strain of racism does not bother with colour or religion at all, though it may seem that way at first. It evolves from attitude. Attitudism is best defined as a conscious decision to go against the harmony of a civilized nation, or the refusal to co-exist peacefully with a majority. (Note in the above picture that the white chap with dreads and the Islamic skin-headed chap appear to be on the same team.)

Attitudism might best explain why a white man can mow his lawn next to a black man or a Muslim across the street doing the same, yet drive across the railroad tracks and snear at the common white trash living in trailer parks. This is not to be confused with so-called class differences, either. The dweller of this small cottage would not merit a snear…

So the next time someone calls you a racist for snearing at a black man in a hoody walking a Pit Bull and selling crack, tell them they are wrong.

Racism may in fact have been replaced by the modern Attitudism, but Isms in general will never die so long as mankind retains his instinct for survival. Regardless of what the women on The View might think.

Once again, this is J. Walten Dare declaring: PROBLEM SOLVED!

Cheerio!

I pulled this headline from Huffington online today…. sounds a bit like what those American chaps did across the pond to handle their nasty Native Indian problem in America. Only problame-o, Hamas will not be bought off with a few glass trinkets and a promise of a piece of land that resembles that of a American Indian reservation.

One of the keener things here is… that no one had ~in your chaps terms~ the backs of the Native Indians. I bet if it were to happen today, you bleeding heart Americans would see their side of things ~Native Americans~ and would be fighting for their right to be a sovereign nation.

Funny how one mans terrorism is another mans fight for what is rightfully theirs… or an act of brutally stealing what you believe to be God given. You folks called Indians savages, for the way they lived and fought. Actually, they were freedom fighters like your Reagan’s, Iran-Contra mess.

Curious how one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter… guess I suppose which side your for, doesn’t it.

Israels terroristic genocide is held by too many as a war for security… security.

Mark my words… this situation will be, what it will be, until either one is gone from that region of the world, or… reservationed into a near extinction by the World community.

Curious how things never change…

I know how you Americans enjoy your pic’s… Take a look at these.

Cheerio!

When it comes to controversy, I always have an opinion.

Today’s hot topic: gay marriage.

In the ever-increasing drama over marriage, many gay Americans find themselves staunchly defending their position — whether it’s bareback, missionary-style, or strictly oral.

Today, we shall attempt to unearth the truth behind the recent firestorm ignited by California’s Proposition 8.

Personally, I find the whole thing positively absurd. Marriage is an institution — a unique club, if you will. It was created by heterosexuals thousands of years ago as a celebration of the union between a man and a woman.

Today, homosexuals in America receive the greatest protection and acceptance than at any other time in history. As a matter of fact, most heterosexuals have neither a problem with gay people nor their desire to be recognized in a union.

The problem arises in the sharing of the title, “Marriage”.

You see, “Donald Trump” and “Oprah Winfrey” are unique titles as well. One does not need to share their particular title in order to be recognized as equal. “Joe Smith” or “Jane McGillicuddy” will work just as nicely in America.

Likewise, changing your name to “Donald Trump” or “Oprah Winfrey” will not entitle you to their talents nor their bank accounts… you will always be You deep down inside.

Now that we have titles down, hopefully you recognize that it isn’t important what we call ourselves, just that titles are unique qualifiers that help us differentiate between one and another. And that isn’t a bad thing. Can you imagine calling for a dog in a room full of “Rovers”? Silly now, isn’t it!

Finally, for those of you who insist on putting salt in the pepper shaker, think about this: Do you really think the salt shaker is any less valuable? Or do you secretly think that salt, once safely inside, magically turns into pepper?

Or truthfully now — do you simply want to force the world to eat your spepper?

Cheerio! Jolly good!

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)