Philup McCrevisDecember 29, 2009 5:56 pm

Nothing like being a Ted Kennedy Kinda Drunk… and why not, country going… going… GONE! Down the tubes.

I don’t know… Could be just punch drunk from all the Republican blunder this year.

J. Walten DareDecember 28, 2009 9:49 am

In a day where syndromes lead the way for more ‘pills and passes’ for societies around the globe, I too wanted to find a reason for the American society to adopt failed socialist health care practices. It would be nice if these failed practice that I speak of could be disputed, then I would not have to look to a psychological diagnoses, but they can not.

Time after time, example after example, it has been shown and proven that a government mandated heath care systems falls short on care, and cost much more than originally proposed. And when those in socialized medical systems go looking for care not covered by their government mandated system, they don’t go looking to other socialized medical providers… no, no they do not! When socialized medicine falls short, -and it does throughout the world- those that are able to make a choice between what is mandated or what is better or the best, look to America and her health care system. This is a fact that can not be disputed nor can it be overlooked.

As you can gleam from the information below, America has 10 to the top 12 hospitals in the world.

Top 12 World Hospitals

If this is true, then what is the problem? The problem is that a hospital and them being the best or worst is not based on the level of governmental health care your country has. Health care and health care systems are based on things such as ease of access, who and what is covered, cost, governmental involvement… Hospitals are based on technology and how those technologies are used for the overall success in specific areas of health.

Got all that, Cherio!

So, in a country of 300+ million, were over 90% of its citizens have one form of coverage, be willing to commit their souls, to insure that 18 to 26 million have continuous health coverage. And to add insult to injury, the majority not covered are illegal immigrants, and the rest could be covered by expanding the parameters of Medicaid or Medicare to include these folks. Munchausen by proxy syndrome (MBPS) is where my findings have lead me.

MBPS a relatively uncommon condition that involves the exaggeration or fabrication of illnesses or symptoms by a primary caretaker. One of the most harmful forms of child abuse, MBPS was named after Baron von Munchausen, an 18th-century German dignitary known for telling outlandish stories. In 98% of MBPS cases, the perp is a female, and victim is typically pre-school aged.

If you change the interpretation of the maternal understanding to include how government tries to fulfill what they perceive our needs to be and the methods that are used to secure the constant state of the significance they derive from this… Then you can understand why my findings have lead me to this diagnoses and syndrome.

This is to say… Because Congress appears to be so caring and attentive, often no one suspects any wrongdoing. This is a perplexing aspect of the syndrome and it is what gives the ability of the Congress to fool us by ‘misinterpreting to manipulate’ our founding fathers ideals.

Further examination of the syndrome indicates that typically, it isn’t just the attention that’s gained from the “illness” of the child that drives this behavior, but also the satisfaction in being able to deceive individuals that they consider to be more important and powerful than themselves.

Our government relies on the ‘exaggeration or fabrication of (societal) symptoms’ so that they may continue the dependency. This dependent state of existence can and will lead to the empowerment of a political party or ideal with a singularity desired for personal and idealogical empowerment. This acts as the conduit for the manifestation of the ‘exaggerated’ socially accepted condition or ideal.

When this condition is ultimately realized, it will lead us as a society to treat the body of Congress as our maternal mother and in-turn allow the manifestation of the maternal blind trust of a child like dependency. This maternal connection will signal the Congress to believe that its ideals are more important than heath or needs of the whole of the society and will continue to use that blind trust to convey a constants state of ‘exaggerated illness.’ This will allow the Congress to perpetuate the conditions of dependency and relegate the welfare of the whole to being irrelevant unless they serve a purpose to elevate the importance of the Congress.

Because Congress appears to be so caring and attentive, often no one suspects any wrongdoing. A perplexing aspect of the syndrome is the ability of the Congress to fool and manipulate us through legislation. This is to say… Frequently, Congress is familiar with the how legislation is received by most of us and what effects it will have. Also, at what lengths they will go to fooling one another into how it all serves the common good.

Even the most experienced in Congress can miss the meaning of the inconsistencies in how legislation has been applied, leading to a misinterpretation derogatory social symptoms. We have seen in our past that it’s not unusual for legislators, when faced with the consequence of legislative decisions will turn a blind eye to all that goes on, based on the belief that Congress would never deliberately hurt his or her own subjects.

So What Happens to the Citizenry?

In the most severe instances, Congress may go to great lengths to make their subjects sick or dependent. When cameras in the Senate and House of Representatives are tuned on, some Congress persons can be seen switching stories, injecting the classes with conjecture and class envy rhetoric as to cause infection, or placing misleading statements or half truths before that which is already proven.

Some Congress persons may aggravate an existing problem, such as manipulating racial or socials status so that the social consciousness can never heal. One Congress person discovered that continuously reciting misleading snippets of information would cause a baffling, long-lasting recession.

Whatever the course, the citizenry plight — whether created or faked — don’t happen when the Congress isn’t trying to use legislation for the means of social engineering or wanting to create a atmosphere of preconceived social illness and dependency. When Congress gets out of the way, we have seen periods of outstanding growth, both socially and individual. When confronted with these truths Congress usually denies knowing how the plight began or for that matter who or whom was responsible.

According to experts, common conditions and symptoms that are created or faked by Congress include: Unfair Tax System, Healthcare, Civil Rights, Leveling Playing Field, The Working Poor, Whithering on the Vine, and Educational Reform… just to name a few

The long-term prognosis for us as subjects of a more socialized society depends on the degree of damage created by Congress and the amount of time it takes to recognize, diagnose and start taking back responsibility for one self.

Political PyroDecember 25, 2009 3:11 pm

Here we go again…

Party apologists abound, dead journalism in this country is more interested in party loyalty than the country itself. Jonathan Chait, Obama apologist from The New Republic, has decided to enlighten us with a piece that explains how the Obama administration has absolutely nothing to do with the current economic downturn. See it here.

Here is the opening paragraph:

President Obama is like a pilot who took the controls of the plane in mid-flight after the engines fell out. It’s obvious that he didn’t cause the problem. But the passengers are going to focus on the fact that the plane was still airborne before he took over, and now, he’s crash-landing in the ocean. That’s Obama’s problem in the debate over the economy. His arguments are true. The trouble is, they don’t feel true, and they feel less and less true as time goes by.

Airplane analogies are among my favorite to use in politics. Who can resist the fun of explaining that one is out of fuel and coming in for a hard landing?

The plane in Chait’s analogy, is the American ecomony. But the problem with Mr. Chait’s analogy, of course, is that the engines have not fallen off this plane, nor has the plane run out of fuel, nor has something gone wrong with the wings, the tail, or the rudders. The only problem with this perfectly functioning plane, the greatest the world has ever known, is that we have been flying around in circles for the past 20 years without a sober Captain…

Enter Barack Obama…

The state of the economy, er, the plane, was a known quantitative at the time of the 2008 elections. No one shoved this guy out from coach into the cockpit and demanded he take us to the nearest airport. It was he who stepped up and convinced everyone on board that only he could save us from an imminent crash into the sea…

Instead of taking a page from the Harry Truman “The Buck Stops Here!” presidency — Barack Obama has instead chosen to borrow a chapter or two from Prissy of “Gone With the Wind” fame…


"I’se knows all ’bout birthin’ babies."

Finally, there’s another analogy that ranks among my favorites when discussing politics — especially Obama’s handling of the American economy…


Political PyroDecember 23, 2009 9:04 pm

In the era of free-loving bra-burning acid-tripping hippies, America’s innocent youth — just a decade beyond “Leave It to Beaver”-land — finally grew up and reformulated themselves into the quintessential Rebels With a Cause.

The cause: Standing up for minorities and free spirits crushed by the oppressive American establishment of rich old white men who sought to divide, control, and diminish every aspect of individuality and non-conformity in American society in order to protect their power…

Part of this establishment control, through the eyes of the hippies, was sending young men off to a “war” they knew nothing about — Vietnam.

The Vietnam conflict began under the Republican Eisenhower administration, escalated under the Democratic Kennedy administration, further escalated under the Democratic Johnson administration, and dragged on through the Republican Nixon administration until it finally ended under Republican Gerald Ford.

To call the Vietnam Conflict the product of either the Republican or Democratic Party was partisan nonsense to a hippie. However, what today’s progressive youth doesn’t seem to comprehend is exactly what the Hippies came to know very well in the 1960s: That the two-party political system most Americans believe we participate in is nothing more than a one-party system with two branches.

A great modern day example of this seamless continuation of the abuse of power is the Patriot Act. Democrats’ heads nearly exploded at the notion that George W. Bush was abusing his authority by using the war on terror as an excuse to spy on Americans. Today, that same authority exists for the Obama administration yet not one single Democratic politician is calling for its dismantling.

The other obvious modern day example is the continuation of the war in Afghanistan. Yet today, Democrats of all ages have convinced themselves that the war was George W. Bush’s fault and that Barack Obama is merely stuck with cleaning up the mess that he was given. But, history tells us that that was not the case with Presidents Kennedy and Johnson who escalated the Vietnam conflict from the Eisenhower strategy years earlier.

What a difference 40 years makes…

Today’s protesters are merely oriented to party loyalty.

What significant change occurred over the last 40 years that made America’s true independent thinking, individualistic Rebels With a Cause change from believing in only themselves — to blindly believing in the service of only the Democratic Party?

Two of the most prominent minority groups in America now sit squarely under the Democratic Party umbrella: Blacks and homosexuals.

Blacks who had been denied equal treatment as whites ever since racism was created by the political establishment (through the right to vote) in Colonial Jamestown as a means to divide the growing lower-class population who were becoming a threat through growing populations.

Homosexuals who had been branded ’sinners’ by the Christian religious establishment who have repeatedly reinterpreted the Greek word Malakos over the centuries to satisfy their own personal agendas…

Terry Lanciotti 7:36 am

balloon boy

In order to justify the passage of a health care bill with growing opposition by the American people, Democrat talking heads have begun to use Medicare’s low approval numbers (28% at inception) as an example of how a government program can eventually be tolerated — then loved. Today’s Medicare approval numbers are over 90%.

The talking heads are using this example as a way of explaining that the great unwashed masses were too stupid to recognize the brilliance of that particular government program — and only today have the intellectual capacity to fully understand it’s necessity.

I suggest otherwise….

Regardless of the benefits of government programs in the future, the ability of the American people to stand against such a program suggests contentment. 72% of Americans were content without Medicare at the time of its inception — never mind their ability to comprehend it. If they were miserable or lining up at soup kitchens at the time of the poll, they would have said “Hell Yes” to anything.

And that is all that matters… Contentment is free…. Medicare is a financial black hole.

Medicare rising from 28% approval ratings to over 90% in a matter of only a few decades suggests not American ignorance but rather the strange effects of Stockholm Syndrome…

Patty Hearst... PLO Bitch

Moreover, just as victim that takes on the characteristics of its captors, we as an American culture have assimilated and begun to take on the characteristics of our most popular media outlets. We no longer think for ourselves, or for that matter insist upon our media to hold our political leaders accountable for their niggeredly behavior… no, no not at all. All we want is the sensational, and our drive-by media is more than happy to be the conduit to facilitated the process. This process has enabled a do nothing, no nothing political parasite come to power… and all over his putrid half Negro genetic spawn to a white trash whore.

All media has sold-out to what sells, and more often than not; that which sells resembles a steamy pile of dog shit.

We as an American society must now start to treat our media as nothing more than socialist propaganda; bent on twisting the arms of apathetic whites, provoking race baiter’s and preying upon ‘the social safety net’ ignorant among us.

All we need to do is take a look at the Obama “Hope” poster. The texture and style do not resemble that of an American culture… no not at all.

Side by side with Soviet propaganda we can see the what the real state of mind that the Obama vision of Hope is wanting us to believe.
This version of the Obama Hope poster was the most popular among Obamas ‘Hopian‘ followers.

Terry LanciottiDecember 22, 2009 11:49 pm

An Insult To Our Democracy!

Take a look at how the actual vote went down for Obamacare… What a JOKE!


This is what we have become… are we not so proud!

Terry Lanciotti 11:33 pm

We Are No Longer a Nation of Laws but of Rules and the Back Dooring of these Rules.


Section 3403 of Senator Harry Reid’s amendment requires that “it shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection.” The good news is that this only applies to one section of the Obamacare legislation. The bad news is that it applies to regulations imposed on doctors and patients by the Independent Medicare Advisory Boards a/k/a the Death Panels.

Section 3403 of Senator Reid’s legislation also states, “Notwithstanding rule XV of the Standing Rules of the Senate, a committee amendment described in subparagraph (A) may include matter not within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Finance if that matter is relevant to a proposal contained in the bill submitted under subsection (c)(3).” In short, it sets up a rule to ignore another Senate rule.

DEMINT: But, Mr. President, as the chair has confirmed, Rule 22, paragraph 2, of the standing rules of the Senate, states that on a measure or motion to amend the Senate rules, the necessary affirmative vote shall be two-thirds of the senators present and voting. Let me go to the bill before us, because buried deep within the over 2,000 pages of this bill, we find a rather substantial change to the standing rules of the Senate. It is section 3403 and it begins on page 1,000 of the Reid substitute. . . . These provisions not only amend certain rules, they waive certain rules and create entirely new rules out of whole cloth.”

The Senate President disagreed and said it was a change in procedure, not a change in rules, therefore the Senate precedent that a two-thirds vote is required to change the rules of the Senate does not apply.

Senator DeMint responded:

DEMINT:
and so the language you see in this bill that specifically refers to a change in a rule is not a rule change, it’s a procedure change?

THE PRESIDING OFFICER:
that is correct.

DEMINT:
then i guess our rules mean nothing, do they, if they can re define them. thank you. and i do yield back.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER:
the senate stands adjourned until 7:00 a.m. tomorrow.

That’s right. When confronted with the facts, the Senate Democrats ran for cover. The Senate Democrats are ignoring the constitution, the law, and their own rules to pass Obamacare.

    To quote the Declaration of Indepedence:

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

This is what we have become! Are you not proud…

Political PyroDecember 20, 2009 4:00 pm


Political Pyro 3:21 pm

Who says Hitler was a tyrant? Look, here he is enjoying a Christmas Holiday meal with his soldiers…

Likewise, Sen. Harry Reid had chosen this festive occasion to provide “healthcare for all Americans — or else.” When we finally get to read this bill that is being rammed through the Senate in a way that would make Obama’s “Safe School Czar”, Kevin “The Fister” Jennings green with envy, I’m sure it will be good for all Americans just as Reid promises…

Let’s keep our fingers crossed!!!

Political Pyro 2:12 pm

Considering there are now 60 Senators and a radical President supporting the demise of the American healthcare system, one would think the culprits involved would pledge their allegiance to Harry Reid, then run as far away from Washington as fast as their private Lear jets can take them…

But not Ben Nelson.

He has voluntarily branded the number “60″ on his forehead like a political cross hair to his career. So much for this clown.


The lone tree gets the lightning…

Political Pyro 1:19 pm

History will show that the Socialization of America unfolded under cover of night while Americans were fast asleep…

In Washington D.C., only politicians and whores are conducting business at one o’clock in the morning.


Brave New World

Rarely in American history has its citizenry been faced with the possibility of having to relocate their lives to a foreign land in search of freedom. After all, America had been created to be that destination for millions of people escaping tyranny throughout history.

From the imperialist shackles of the British Empire, the concentration camps of Nazi Germany, or the Siberian gulags of the tyrannical Soviet Union — the oppressed of the world have always sought refuge in America.

Oops. Parisians React Hitler Moves Into the City of Lights...
Parisians React as Hitler Moves Into the City of Lights…

In 2009, with the impending health care “reform” looming on the horizon, Americans are losing their individual liberties in exchange for the “greater good” of the “Collective.” Conspiracy theorists in the 1980s warned of the impending New World Order. Today, these conspiracy theories are looking more and more like prophesies…

Terry LanciottiDecember 18, 2009 12:00 pm

Anybody just want to go get a beer?

COPENHAGEN — A visibly angry Barack Obama threw down the gauntlet at China and other developing nations Friday, declaring that the time has come to “not to talk but to act” on climate change.

EWWWW!!! Hes angry… Maybe its because he could not find anyone -even in Denmark- that would follow him to a peep show that had Tiger Woods and every chick hes has used his ‘long woods’ on… and featured in a Ted Kennedy styled Hyannis Port compound Gang Bang.

Lighten Up Obama! Get use to becoming and being more irrelevant then the gum scraped off a New Yorkers shoe when your term is over!

Just as the ‘snake oil‘ salesman he is… selling his rot, moving from town to town… It is so good to see that people have finally figured out that a vision with out the knowledge on how to fulfill it means absolutely nothing.

Better Yet… The Rev. Manning Has a Better Idea.

Arrest Obama NOW

Sic Transit GloriaDecember 15, 2009 10:46 pm


Allen West for Congress…

Terry LanciottiDecember 14, 2009 7:12 am

Manning Comments on Obama and His Noble Peace Prize… Priceless!


>>>
CLICK HERE TO WATCH<<<

Terry LanciottiDecember 7, 2009 8:50 pm

Well, first of all, he is the husband of a Democratic congresswoman from Illinois: REP. JAN SCHAKOWSKY, D-ILL.: And next to me was a guy from the insurance company who then argued against the public health insurance option, saying it wouldn’t let private insurance compete. That a public option will put the private insurance industry out of business and lead to single-payer.

This is Becks spin, but ther is much more to this then just a nice juicy rating boost.

Robert Creamer is a felon with the goods to smear you… with opinions that cut to the chase. “Seems the abortion issue is just a diversion,” As per Robert Creamer — the convicted felon who, inspired by Saul Alinsky, wrote “Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win,” which contains the guidelines for the Obamacare scam — details like abortion do not matter. They will “compromise” on any such “details.” What matters is just gaining control. Once in control, they’ll do as they please.

And we can see the horrors they have in store for us based on Obama’s pro-abortion and pro-infanticide (late-term abortion) stand, and the aberrant stands of Obama’s Health Care Czar Ezekiel Emanuel and Science Czar John Holdren.

Obama’s Health Care Czar Ezekiel Emanuel, rightfully called “Doctor Death,” would make Dr. Kervorkian proud.

Dr. Emanuel has said that “Medical care should not be given to those who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens.”

As per Dr. Emanuel, your mother suffering from Alzheimer’s or your child diagnosed with Down’s Syndrome SHOULD NOT receive medical care.

Put it all in your hat, mix it up and you have got a sick and twisted way to parse the “entitlement” social safety net.

Dr Philip McCrevisDecember 6, 2009 11:23 am

Throughout history, nations have endured the ego maniacal wrath of dictators. Dictators, such as Castro and Lenin, are usually empowered by a political revolutions that involve millions. It is true their egos developed later, but their beginnings were humble and these dictators dressed plainly from a harbored belief that they remained one of the people. Pinochet, Duvalier, and Mao Tse Tung, never shed the military uniform that served as a symbolic reminder of the genuine movements that propelled them to power. Royalty, another form of dictatorship, was derived not from ego but from a people’s desire to be lead by divinity. A king was informed of this “divinity” at birth and later came to believe in it.

Hitler, Stalin, and Obama are different. They were not propelled by revolution. They merely fabricated it out of thin air to satisfy their egos. In short, they inflated existing discontent to create manufactured chaos as a means to power.

Hitler was a failed art student. Yet so are millions. Most create art as a means of self-expression. Hitler created as a vessel for adulation to compensate for his lack of self-esteem. When he did not earn respect, he sought it by force. However, Hitler found that the contrived adulation of his people based on his false persona was not enough. Eventually he needed to destroy those not like him – then needed more adulation from neighboring Poland, Denmark, and France…

Lenin despised Stalin and supported Trotsky. Stalin simply eliminated Trotsky by assassination. Obama eliminated Alice Palmer by nullifying her eligibility. Stalin eliminated his opponent then silenced the majority with fear. Obama lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton, but used his foot soldiers to organize caucus fraud – and the threat of racial upheaval to extort super delegates.

Obama’s ego, like Hitler’s, is nothing more than a mask to hide a lifelong crisis of identity. Torn by opposing hereditary colors and religions, Obama has chosen to forge his own identity for political purposes through Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Michelle. The white blood of a whore is his primary demon – he wants to eradicate it but can only suppress it. His secondary demon – homosexuality – developed from his misguided adolescent search for the father who abandoned him as a child. It was camouflaged by marrying Michelle, a strong-minded black woman who offers a sense of masculinity.

Obama sought to open a dialogue on racism in America, but has yet to do so. The reason is that it has been evolving nicely until he personally forced the wound back open and salted it to satisfy his quest for power. The racism he sought to lecture us on was in his own soul, not ours. It reverberates in his psyche on a daily basis. It is a source of his illness and the driving force of his political ambition.

Obama’s political ideology is best explained through an inspirational sermon delivered by Reverend Wright, “White Man’s Greed Runs a World in Need”. Perhaps the topic is taboo, but the only “great” civilization to stem from Africa was Egypt. That does not imply that lesser cultures have not found happiness or are lesser men for their contentment with a humble existence. To clarify, many humble African tribes do not achieve “greatness” only when greed, modern invention, and conquering power are the litmus.

Paradoxically, the Global Socialist doctrine Obama adheres to and the so-called remedy for a planet of inequality does not suggest that white man’s progress not interfere with the black man’s tranquility. On the contrary, it suggests that Western wealth and prosperity should be taken away by force and donated to the “lesser” societies. Global Socialism ignores the fact that some civilizations simply don’t have the desire to propel themselves into the white man’s definition of greatness. These civilizations are Conservative by nature, not Progressive. Therefore, they are “in need” to Obama and the Socialists and must receive enlightenment. The very existence of this doctrine is completely racist in it’s suggestion that less wealthy societies are “a world in need”.

A Conservative believes freedom propels a man toward his own vision of success regardless of wealth or status. To believe all men do not possess this ability – in short, that some are inferior and need guidance – is the underlying root of Socialism.

Naturally, Obama was able to maneuver through this evil abyss called America, but that is because he is divine. He thinks much less of you. You do not possess this ability. But like a balloon that never plateaus, Obama – just as Hitler – will rise to self-destruction. When Obama comes to realize that his adulation stems from his false self, he will become lethal. He is too weak to tell us who he really is – he expects us to guess – and he will punish those of us who don’t.

Unable to find personal happiness, Hitler and Obama choose to make the world in their own image by punishing happiness. However, unlike Hitler, Obama will not use military force to conquer foreign lands. Instead, he will use the redistribution of wealth to bring the American Dream down to its knees.

So the super ego comparison of Hitler, Stalin, and Obama is plainly different than the standard dictator. Undoubtedly, some may resent the comparison since Obama has not caused the deaths of countless millions. Yet the comparison of the super ego remains valid despite the difference of their method of silencing dissent.

German author W.G. Sebald explored the national psychosis that consumes his country to this day. It is a national shame created when his people decided to share the vision of a madman. Given the track record of the failure of Socialism, what national psychosis should we be prepared to treat fifty years after Obama’s rule? The Germans chose to simply erase Hitler from their children’s text books.

For America, a ten trillion dollar investment in ego may not be quite as easy to erase.

Political Pyro 10:47 am

 

 

 

 

Pyro’s Health Care Plan


or


Tax breaks = “free” health insurance


The health care “crisis” in this country can be resolved in two simple steps without the need to create a monolithic new government bureaucracy or raise a single dime in new taxes.

First, give tax cuts to any individual purchasing private health insurance or any business providing coverage for their employees. Second, use half of those tax cuts for medical expenses. It’s as simple as that.

As I look at my current pay stub, I notice that I earn $2,143.84 a month. Federal and state taxes combined amount to $467.38 a month. Cutting my taxes by one-third would give me an extra $155 a month. Blue Cross offers coverage for individuals on line starting at $120.

Now if politicians want to get creative and take this a step further, they could reduce my tax burden by slightly more than half which would leave me with an extra $240 a month, subtract the $120 for the insurance premium, and place the other $120 in a private medical fund which accumulates over time allowing me $1,400 a year for medical expenses. Now, not only do I have health insurance, I have money set aside to combat rising costs.

This isn’t rocket science.

Returning fifty percent of my taxes may sound “expensive”, but in reality it is only a few hundred dollars a month and a fraction of the money generated by taxes. Compared with the government budget, that money is an infinitesimal drop in the bucket for them but can mean the difference between life and death for me.

These figures are based on a modest income level of $28,000 annually, which means any individual at or above this income will be easily covered. The minimum tax cuts would be double the amount of the premium for middle-class Americans – and the maximum cuts would be 10% of income taxes for wealthier Americans.

Here’s where the creativity sets in…

An income earner making twice my salary would essentially need only a quarter reduction in income taxes to buy the same premium. On the flip side, an individual making only $14,000 would need 100% percent of their taxes used toward the same health care coverage , so the government would not run into negatives until insuring individuals who make less than $14,000 a year.

For those individuals who make less than $14,000 a year, a small percentage of the wealthier income tax can be added to the health care pool so that all Americans are covered.

For example, without knowing Donald Trump’s finances, I am assuming that his taxable income is probably over the fifty percent range. He may very well pay $20 million a year in taxes, so if 10% of his taxes were used for health care, that would leave $2 million (minus his own premium) to go into the health care pool to help cover those in the low income bracket.

Trump alone would insure over 8,300 people if the government used only 10% of the taxes they already take from him and applied it toward health care. Government would still be free to squander the other $18 million they take from him annually.

So, if government used only 10% of the taxes from an individual making $80,000 – not only would there be enough money for that person to buy their own coverage and establish a health fund – one other American making less than $14,000 a year would be given the same coverage and fund as well.

Considering that the government would still have 90% of the income taxes generated by Americans making over $80,000 a year (this of course does not include revenue generated from sales tax, estate tax, death tax, property tax, gift tax, ass tax, and other onerous forms of government theft) – and considering that the government was perfectly functional 150 years before income taxes even existed, I would love to hear a politician try to explain how giving us our own money to use on health care is unsatisfactory compared to completely turning the entire medical system upside down on its head.

Politicians make the solution to the health care “crisis” sound complex and confusing, but in reality the solution is simple:


Give us our damn money back.

 

 

 

 

Terry LanciottiDecember 4, 2009 8:02 am

This video of Bill Ayers has surfaced calling out his fellow socialist bud out.


JoanSharonDecember 3, 2009 10:49 am

Fighting a WAR Based on Time Tables and Statistics
By Dr. Richard Swier | 12/02/09 | 06:45 AM EDT

Starting last night President Obama is now fighting his war. A war based on time tables and statistics. President Obama is using his domestic policy strategies and applying them to land warfare. My fear is just as his domestic policies are failing so will his war policy in Afghanistan fail.

President Obama has the proclivity to make promises he cannot keep at the expense of the pain and suffering of those who are harmed by that policy. On the economy President Obama promised that if we just passed his “stimulus bill”, his economic surge, all would be well and unemployment would not go over 8%. He promised immediate job savings and creation of new jobs. Everything he promised has not come true. It that his fault? Did he make his decisions based upon bad information? Did he not see that the economy was in worse shape than it was? Remember President Obama has the best minds and data available and yet his economic strategy has not worked. It may have even made things worse.

The unemployment rate rose from 9.8 to 10.2 percent in October, and nonfarm
payroll employment continued to decline (-190,000), the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics reported today. The largest job losses over the month were in con-
struction, manufacturing, and retail trade.

The unemployment rate rose by 0.4 percentage point to 10.2 percent,
the highest rate since April 1983. Since the start of the recession in
December 2007, the number of unemployed persons has risen by 8.2 million,
and the unemployment rate has grown by 5.3 percentage points.
This information was released - Friday, November 6, 2009

Fast forward to his speech last night at the United States Military Academy at West Point. We see the same strategy in place. We will put more troops into Afghanistan, much like putting more federal stimulus dollars into our economy. The results will be specific increases in both the capability and size of Afghan police and military forces, much like creating or saving jobs in our down economy. And like magic in July 2011 we will begin to withdraw, much like his promises we will be out of the recession by next year.

Brzezinski tells Sam Stein over on HuffPo:

Who are we to seriously be preaching [such] a crusade? We have a financial sector that is voraciously greedy and exploitative, to put it mildly.

We have a Congress which is not immune to special interests. And we have an electoral system that is based largely on private donations which precipitate expectations of rewards.

The notion of us going to the Afghans and preaching purity is comical… I think we should just quit that stuff.

It may be fine to play with the economy and try things like deficit spending and more government control of industries like banking, automobile manufacturing, healthcare and insurance. While these policies have caused many people pain, and aren’t working, we may recover eventually. In war the same rules do not apply and the stakes are much higher.

The first thing I learned at the Field Artillery Officer’s Basic Course in 1967 was that every battle plan, no matter how detailed and well conceived, comes apart at first contact with the enemy. We have a President and his administration who believes that if we just have a plan we will achieve “success”. Success, no matter how painfully we achieve it, is not victory. That is the element missing from President Obama’s strategy.

Victory is not President Obama’s end game. Saying we will have a fully functional Afghan military and police force capable of taking control of that nation by July 2011 is pure fantasy. But fantasy and false hope are the only things left to this administration. Reality and conditions on the ground have never been in their lexicon. Defining “success” is much easier than defining victory.

This may sound like ’splitting of a hair’, but lets look at the concept of “WAR” and defining the outcome. If we are able to let our selfs do this, we can only come to one conclusion about what Barack Obama is trying to achieve… The ‘Vietnaming’ of The United States efforts as a whole in The War Against Terror and a Nixon type ending.

This outcome will see Obama and his ilk rubber stamped back into the Oval Office by his socialist, tree hugging, Kool-aid guzzling wannabe 70’s peace nicks and the corrupt political organizations spawned by his ‘Hopian‘ vision… for a second term of HELL ON EARTH socialism.

Wars are either won or lost, period. No amount of declared success can give either side a qualified VICTORY!

Throughout time, the quantifying of Victory is established when either side gives their unconditional surrender. We as a nation, as for nothing else, should have taken away from Vietnam this one lesson. We should have learned from Vietnam… We must have learned that!

Before Obama, I would bet you that you could not point to a presidential speech or position from our past about war that makes the leap from having successes to declaring victory.

It is reckless and irresponsible for The President of The United States or for that matter any world leader make such an error in judgment. Victory or Defeat is the axiom when it pertains to WAR, and nothing else matters. Lanciotti ~ Political Pyro Contributor.

President Obama is no President Roosevelt who demanded the “unconditional surrender” of our enemies. That is the only definition of victory. If our end game is not victory then I say we should withdraw immediately from Afghanistan and focus on the real threat in the Middle East - Iran.

Political PyroNovember 30, 2009 11:20 pm

Like Woodrow Wilson, whose wife essentially ran the country for over a year when he was incapacitated by a stroke, Ted Kennedy clung to power tighter than his own wheelchair as bouncers from a local titty bar lifted the half-dead Senator on and off his royal yacht to sail the holy waters surrounding the vast Kennedy compound in Hyannis Port.

It’s rumored that during Barack Obama’s inaugural ball when Teddy suffered a massive seizure, someone managed to force a pen between his teeth to sign one last bill. Even in death, another rumor insists, Kennedy still retains his beloved power by signing legislation when aids place documents on his grave for two drops of alcohol percolating from the gin-soaked soil above his coffin. These drops, like the drool from the corners of Wilson’s paralyzed mouth will serve as an official signature until a replacement can be named in 2025 when the grave is expected to run dry.

Any senator with even the smallest regard for his constituents would have allowed the voters of his state the chance to name his replacement the second he was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer.

But not Teddy Kennedy.

A Kennedy never resigns.

Alas, only God could remove Ted Kennedy from the Senate chamber. Perhaps near the end he thought he could buy his way out of death with his father’s blood fortune amassed during his gangster days as a rum runner.

In the 1970’s, after the success of Mary Jo’s demise, Ted Kennedy elected himself mayor of Cooterville and stampeded his way through fifths of Jack Daniels and a populace of pussy. The decade took it’s toll on the family legend. In 1980, after losing his party’s nomination to a Georgia hick, Ted Kennedy must have known that his chance at martyrdom would never come.

Not worth the price of the metal for a single bullet, by 1980 Ted Kennedy obtained a life-long pass from the American Snipers Association.

The key to Kennedy’s character was his unwillingness to resign from the power bestowed upon him partly by a father obsessed with buying all his sons a golden ticket to power, partly by the braindead citizens of Massachusetts who in 47 years lacked the vision to cast their sacred vote for anyone other than a dead president’s brother.

So the Senate seat now sits as vacant as the eyes of Mary Jo Kopechne amidst the ruins created by a man whose sole legacy was creating piles of human wreckage for someone else to sort through and clean up. Without his father or his brothers here to pick up the phone and come to Teddy’s rescue, it looks as if that final task will be left to the voters of Massachusetts.

Thanks, Ted.